on second look
on second look
- Started
- Last post
- 11 Responses
- ********
Mark Rothko doesn't hold up
- mg330
I'm pretty much with you on that.
A couple architecture professors when I was in school were super into his paintings, but most of the time I was wondering what the point was.
One need only realize they should be able to google "boring" and find exactly this:
http://images.google.com/images?…
- ********0
david hockney doesn't hold up either
- GreedoLives0
cy twombly
utter shit.
- GreedoLives0
i like rothko tho.
- ********0
Howard Hodgkin
- GreedoLives0
Barnett Newman
- capn_ron0
i like hockney. at least he is more interesting than rothko.
- ********0
yep, 'Stations of the Cross"
heave-ho!
- GreedoLives0
clyfford still
- ********0
Judy Chicago
- material-10
these movements often don't make sense in hindsight. Without the context of the era when they were produced its sometimes hard to accept their importance.