Child Porn!
- Started
- Last post
- 48 Responses
- Jaline0
hahaha, TheBlueOne, so true. Like how people think every upright img is a phallic symbol. STFU!
- ********0
MOAR
- Jaline0
Wait...deep inside neue's post, hidden within the cuticular walls, lies the fact that he likes pleasing the ladies.
- ********0
i can't believe you are talking about cunnilingus in a thread like this jaline.
- ********0
See, while I do appreciate what kuz wrote there, it still reminds me of the Philosophy of Artistic Aesthetic classes I had in college where people would spend an hour arguing whether a hammer or an orange was a truer work of art. I wanted to kill those people...
TheBlueOne
(Sep 27 07, 06:13i dont think this is as futile as that. I think paedophillia is the moral panics of our times. i think this picture holds a mirror to ourselves and shows us that it is we who take the responsibilty of sexualising children. and that engenders guilt in even contemplating whether innocence can be considered obscene.
this is brought into sharp relief by the fact that geordie coppers have seized the pictures and are now trying to investigate whether the children were abused in the taking of that picture. ludicrous.
- kelpie0
no limits to that girls filth. she's gone too far from jesus.
- neue75_bold0
I am an equal opportunity lender...
- GT_10
I thought on the "Well perverts might get off on this photo" argument.
And the answer is, perverts get off on all sorts of things. There's a fetish for watching girls popping balloons for fucks sake.
- kelpie0
yeah don't knock that brother
- ********0
OMFG!!! It's Maddy!!!!!!
- Kirshar0
oh geez.......
yeah, if that is considered worthy of being in a gallery, I'm going to my parent's home and sifting through the old baby albums to make myself an icon to the art world.
Don't stare at my little baby penis either, you pervs.......
- Jaline0
True, GT_1. There is an infinite amount of things people can get off on.
- ********0
lol, kirshar has a little baby penis.
- Kirshar0
I said, don't stare at it.......
- slappy0
Child Porn!
Is this image child porn?hitsusa.com/blog/140/k...
Kuz
(Sep 27 07, 05:32)Yeah right, I'm not falling for that one again!
- kelpie0
that's how he did for Pete Townsend
- kerus0
there's always someone out there who can turn a picture of 1/2 a turd and a pube into a philosophical debate about "the ethics and morality of our culture as a whole"
naked children = cheap heat in the art world. get a new gimmick
- kerus0
woops wasnt trying to discredit you Kuz, i was just making one of my usual asshole blanket statements
- blaw0
a quick image search on nan goldin returns a lot of stuff that looks like plain ol' snapshots to me.
- ********0
You have to look at it context.
Elton John owns it.
Just picture him and Furnish with their grubby mits on a picture of your naked 2 year old, expressing their suppressions...
Filth.
Lock him up and take away his fucking piano.