Dear Mr. President...
- Started
- Last post
- 158 Responses
- mrdobolina0
Dear Mr. President,
Can Virtu have an article without it being partisan or using the word liberal?
Just curious.
- mrdobolina0
err article equals point...
- virtu0
pres,
mrdob is being silly. He is bringing up a seriously bad point. he might not realize that we are arguing politics, and politics inherently have differing sides. and also, partisan means adhereing to one party or the other, which i dont do. and lastly, im a conservative, and the people who have differing opinions from me are those who are on the other side of the political spectrum, and those people are called liberals. So, simply addressing my opposer is not a crime last time i checked.
thank for hearing me out president.
___mje
- mrdobolina0
he just proved he can't.
- virtu0
and you just proved that you dont have an ounce of reason.
what would you like me to do mrdob? would you like me to argue for the other side?
- unfittoprint0
virtu: [..]im a conservative, and the people who have differing opinions from me are those who are on the other side of the political spectrum, and those people are called liberals.[...]
only 2 sides? Must be wonderful 2 live in Wonderland.
- virtu0
im speaking categorically. jesus man, of course there are more than 2 opinions. but, generally speaking, the left and the right sides of the political spectrum have differing views on things.
trying to box me into a corner is not an arguing point, it is a sign of incompetence.
- boolean0
Dear Mr. President,
Why doesn't the NY Times article posted to refute my assertion refute my assertion?
Just curious.
B.
- mrdobolina0
boolean, I dont get it.
- Soler0
pres
virtu is arguing with us "liberals". you don't think he's scared that we found you out, do you? that maybe the free world may be run by someone who is at least not quite as evil- hell, maybe even someday it'll be someone who wasn't a bonesman?
- monkeyshine0
I'm tellin...virtu said the lord's name in vain.
- mrdobolina0
Mr. President,
virtu doesn't understand there was no link between Saddam Hussein and 9/11? 9/11 is what started the terror war and money was diverted from fighting Al Qaeda, the cause of 9/11, to fight Saddam. You are quoted as saying that there was no link between Saddam and 9/11. could you please explain that to virtu.
Thanks.
- virtu0
youve got is soler, you hit the nail on the head with that one.
i hate to even dignify that post with a response...but oh well, its only NT.
- virtu0
mr pres.
please also explain to mrdob that there are more terroist organizations in the world than al quaeda, and that money was put forth to fight all terrorists. And i suppose that the suicide bombings in iraq are not terrorists, oh, thats right....the media calls them insurgents.
got the picture mrdob?
- e-wo0
yes, virtu is "scared that you found out."
because secretly, all conservatives have been in on all the evil dealings of the Bush administration.
they hold secret club meetings at night when all the liberals are asleep.
embrace my sarcasm. maybe, while you embrace it, it will thieve the uneducated beliefs from your coat pocket.
- virtu0
thats a good book froww.
- Soler0
you're right virtu... i shouldn't hold it against him that he's a freak-freemason-bonesman.
[ I know, Kerry was too]
- virtu0
big fing deal!!!!!! how does that play into things in the current times. IT DOESNT!!!!!!! wake up! your doing the same shit the national commitees do, they just dig up irrelevant dirt on people.
- mrdobolina0
virtu, there were already soldiers on the ground in iraq when that money was obviously allocated, some money brought them there, no?