Tarantino's Star Trek

Out of context: Reply #6

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 24 Responses
  • CygnusZero42

    Seems like a really odd choice. He has no experience in sci-fi, not that he cant do it, he's a talented guy, but wth is a Tarantino Star Trek going to be? It's not his wheelhouse.

    Especially with his last few movies, he really only makes like 1 kind of movie. Is it going to be 45 minutes of guys talking on the bridge of the enterprise in a really sarcastic manner? Dunno.

    • I hope he proves me wrong though. Star Trek Beyond was trash without JJ.CygnusZero4
    • Beyond tried fan service with all the ENT references, to save itself.Continuity
    • It's gonna be two hours of Samuel L. Jackson swearing on a spaceship.yuekit
    • "Is it going to be 45 minutes of guys talking on the bridge of the enterprise" Hah that's kinda what the 60's show was in essence.since1979
    • Most of his films are pure fantasy - not having a ski-fi background makes this more interestingSlashPeckham
    • I liked the two JJ movies but Star Trek Beyond was pretty bad. I just think they should keep that cast. I like the altered history too.CyBrainX
    • His last movie seemed like just one big excuse to have people say nigger as many times as possible within 3 hours. Now Star Trek. Haha.monospaced
    • yeah, his last two movies.since1979
    • if people like JJ's version then why wouldnt like tarantino's? the guy has an impeccable record.Miguex
    • I'm open to Tarantino but concerned how they would bring Picard back.CyBrainX
    • Not his wheelhouse?since1979

View thread