crushed blacks, ugh.
Out of context: Reply #27
- Started
- Last post
- 50 Responses
- ********0
I am really appalled and amazed by that star wars article. This looks not bad because of the shot and its Vader...
This is and the other examples is shit...
Also I get the impression Lucas has no idea what he is doing sometimes ... "What is more, the Special Edition version here was only scanned from the film negatives at 1080p. This is to be the new digitial master for the films, and all of the new ILM work was done from this scan. So, if you ever see the films in theatres again, it will be from 1080 lines of resolution, never mind a 2K scan (I guess an 8K scan is just crazy talk at this point). But seeing as Lucas shot his second two prequel films in this same resolution, I guess he really doesn't mind, or notice, the quality difference. I would believe that."
- I can guarantee that the digi stock for the new star wars was at least 4k, where are you getting your info from?zarkonite
- its in the article ^********
- top of page two. the new New scans might be 4k but the older ones apparently weren't.********