gay anti gay?
gay anti gay?
Out of context: Reply #127
- Started
- Last post
- 159 Responses
- scarabin0
you got to your third sentence before it all broke down:
"My understanding is based on *God's* ideas, as put forth in the Bible"
if god wrote the bible he's a fucking retard. if man wrote the bible they're fucking retards. the bible is a flawed document consisting of a conflicting mish-mash of passages so vague anyone can find anything they want in them.
if you're seriously basing your philosophy on one of the most poorly conceived and written pieces of fiction man has ever conceived, i'm afraid there's no hope for you.
here are just a few examples of how absurd it is. the writers couldn't even keep basic ideas consistent and frequently outright contradicted themselves:
- It's my understanding that the bible is a collection of books that have been written by men, and assembled and edited by men. It's interesting to read about the history and how some biblical scholars believe sections were misinterpreted. It calls a lot of what's written into question.
Josev - men. It's interesting to read about the history and how some biblical scholars believe sections were misinterpreted. It calls a lot of what's written into question.
Josev - calls a lot of what's written into question.
Josev - We still have physical copies of either primary, secondary, or third-generation texts.gramme
- We also still have access to the old languages the Bible was written in.gramme
- So the argument from editing doesn't really hold up.gramme
- If anything was improperly translated from one early text to another, it was something like purple to scarlet. Incidental stuff.gramme
- stuff.gramme
- It's my understanding that the bible is a collection of books that have been written by men, and assembled and edited by men. It's interesting to read about the history and how some biblical scholars believe sections were misinterpreted. It calls a lot of what's written into question.