gay anti gay?

Out of context: Reply #71

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 159 Responses
  • locustsloth0

    While i honestly admire your relatively even-handed approach to this, and many other issues where you differ in your opinion from non-believers, this made me chuckle a bit:
    "I've not seen scientific proof which points to genetic disposition."

    A man of faith disbelieving something, based heavily on the fact that there is no SCIENTIFIC proof of it.

    • Clarification: Why is it any different for someone to "know" they are gay than it is for you to "know" there is a god?locustsloth
    • \wow, great point!Josev
    • I see no reason why logic, science, and faith can be varyingly used to arrive at conclusions.gramme
    • *can't be usedgramme
    • —i.e., it depends on the subject at hand... such as divine existence or genetically-driven concernsgramme
    • when it's convenient to switch from logic to fictionscarabin
    • Absolutely not. The method suits the subject. The subject shouldn't be an excuse for a method.gramme

View thread