olympics logo

Out of context: Reply #4

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 39 Responses
  • hans_glib0

    talking of shit logos (file under old news)


    • it's an embarrassment...hans_glib
    • i like it.JOSF
    • don't be so contrary - you know it's rubbishhans_glib
    • black pencilDancer
    • Ctrl + ZPSYKHO
    • the original one looked a bit shit, because of the colours. But i like some of the newer ones. at least it's something new and not boring like all the ones above.JOSF
    • new and not boring like the ones above.JOSF
    • i agree josf, i really think the application of it looks great. fools cant see how good it is - it will be a classic logo in years to come. all the ones above are samey and boring...jimzyk
    • to come. all the ones above are just samey and boring... nothing new.jimzyk
    • joker
      ********
    • distinctive - I agree it will stand out and if any sinilar ones appear they will look copied.Ranger
    • this is funnyDancer
    • ffs people LOOK at it! Look at that execrable typeface and it's lack of any relation to the logo itself.hans_glib
    • and the rings - stuck on as an afterthought. Just cos it's "different" doesn't mean it's good..hans_glib
    • hans I agree with you, the worst logo ever made. That all!FAIL
    • incorrect hans.. have you seen applications? it works so much better than any other olympics logos ive ever seen!jimzyk
    • http://www.wolffolin…
      its iconic, its universal, its not another helvetica & shape logo!
      jimzyk
    • It is DIFFERENT.MrMackem
    • maybe it's sort of like pangea, allland masses coming together as one. Doubtful.tasty
    • I like it. So glad we didnt end up with something generic and Londonykezza_2
    • agree so much more interesting than abovepeterorpete

View thread