Att: QBN

Out of context: Reply #21

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 27 Responses
  • Nairn0

    You'd respond to it in that post's notes, and hope for the best.
    If you go down the path you're suggesting, you'd hint at ever-increasing branch nodes, so that each post could essentially have a sub-tree of infinite note notes. By the time you've managed that, you'd realise you'd filled the entire metaverse with an inefficient information structure that would push out the potential to contain any data. If that happens, you're essentially looking at the last stage before a total cascade collapse - and, as you've filled the entire metaverse with potential, you'd start off another big bang event.

    So leave it the fuck alone, WItt - you do not know with what you meddle.

    • I understand the emotional part, but you better fuckin explain what on earth does "metaverse" means :P
      ********
    • LOL. jk. "metaverse". It's really a word worth exploring the limits of, if you don't mind me saying so.
      ********
    • it's like... semantics... The hardest discipline next to analytical mathmatics.
      ********
    • eh. sorry for the clumsy posting. Tell me more about the cascade collapse :)
      ********

View thread