In the middle..
In the middle..
Out of context: Reply #10
- Started
- Last post
- 24 Responses
- GreedoLives0
i think it's foolishness to compare undeniable physical facts (earth around the sun) with arbitrary objective decisions that change with times (what is best for society etc). And arent all political views self-serving? You might genuinely think what you believe is best for your town/state/country/planet, but so might your opponent who believes the polar opposite.
Compromise doesnt have to be full of shit, it could just be a way to coexist with both sides (why are there only two sides in this country anyways) with both sides losing a bit and gaining a bit.