The Great Flood scientific evidence thread
- Started
- Last post
- 30 Responses
- set-11
https://www.scientificamerican.c…
This evidence plus the fact that the stone inscriptions at Gobekli Tepe describe a comet impact causing a great flood at the exact same period that scientific evidence does.
You can't count on two hands the number of cultures that have stories of a flood that happened around this period.
Now science is starting to agree.
- We do live in amazing times but hey RUSSIA!! ;-)mugwart
- I don't think there is a more fascinating time to be alive in at least the last two thousand years!set
- What I would do to go back to the construction of the great pyramid, though...set
- Which was likely before this comet impact 13,000 years ago, but we won't bring up that topic here ;)set
- The comet in your article had nothing to do with flooding - a comet large enough to flood significantly would be enough to kill everything. It prompted cooling.detritus
- Scientific evidence of a comet at the exact same time ancient cultures said there was one that caused floods, is enough for meset
- Science will figure it out eventuallyset
- Oh, sorry - you/it meant that the climate change ended the Ice Age and that caused flooding? I'm half asleep still.detritus
- (enough for me to think it's the most likely explanation). I have no fucking idea for sure, just like the rest of you.set
- ^ or main stream science would finally catch up ;-)mugwart
- I would've thought such an impact would, like messy volcanic eruptions, cool the atmosphere, not heat it enough to melt ice?detritus
- Sometimes I wish notes updated in realtime, hahadetritus
- Haha totallyset
- i think it is fascinating.ApeRobot
- Sure isset
- Some people would rather ridicule and not even look in to it though. Bizarre isn't it...set
- yup, pretty normal human behavior.ApeRobot
- The five stages of grief.ApeRobot
- I dont get it, there some incredible stuff here... if nothing alone it is fascinating.mugwart
- These are literally the people responsible for holding humanity back.set
- From what?detritus
- From finding out the truth. From learning. From moving forward out of our ignorance. You name it...set
- ^ or even questioning it.mugwart
- We are no longer allowed to question "truth". Because we never have been lied to before ...mugwart
- set-7
- set-10
Randall Carson is another name worth looking in to...
- mugwart0
This one will probably have me laughed at but I have been slowly going throuigh this book (due to time) but I like his approach in the first chapter about why we cant accept new ideas.
This all be right or wrong (I still feel we would benefit from this mind set change).
- since1979-8
The evidence is overwhelming.
- set-13
- do you even sleep bro?GuyFawkes
- Ah, he's shown himself. How are you feeling after posting such embarrassing close minded nonsense?set
- Have a wonderful day. Next time, do a little reading before having such strong opinions.set
- asking for scientific evidence is nonsense?GuyFawkes
- I must go to work now, but i shall return, have a wonderful sleep.GuyFawkes
- No, you didn't ask for evidence. You plainly suggested multiple times in the other thread that it was nonsense. Remember.... ?set
- Your retarded logic about fish? You felt so strongly that you were correct that you created a thread in order to ridicule, with tumbleweeds and everything...set
- At least have some grace about it.set
- you mean reading other's research and then believing it?
;)monospaced - Oh look its super sceptic who cannot assess life on his own and only ever accepts the official explanation for anything...set
- Welcome to the discussion, do you have anything of any value to add?set
- Probably not rightset
- Mono is clearly fully in stage one of the grief stages, too, bless himset
- Dude set. Do you think for a second I would talk about evolution without research? I promise, I’ve done more than any average person. With degrees to back it upmonospaced
- So maybe don’t accuse people of not doing research when in fact you probably didn’t do as much as them ;)monospaced
- Additionally, did you not recognize I copy and pasted your own words basically? It was a JOKE man. Please relax. You seem uptight.monospaced
- The difference is you were talking as if you knew for absolute fact, you don't, I've only ever suggested what is the most likely conclusion based on researchset
- Huuuuge difference...set
- Seriously man, I know that. I was joking around. I get your point. I’ll admit that despite it being the only likely solution ever, evolution could be fake.monospaced
- Which clears the difference. I don’t like fighting. I’m being light hearted. I haven’t challenged a single thing in this thread. Not once.monospaced
- Just reading.monospaced
- ApeRobot0
Check out the work of John Anthony West
https://www.gaia.com/person/john…
- ApeRobot0
Also Robert Schoch
http://www.robertschoch.com/
- ApeRobot0
Robert Bauval
http://www.robertbauval.co.uk/
- Gnash0
this is my favorourite theory. towards the end of the vid it talks about the black sea breach.
- ApeRobot0
This thread will embrace the five stages of grief.
Let the great flood of dowvotes begin. :)- Is the first one blind denial?set
- yes, Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression and Acceptance.ApeRobot
- Flood waters in that region may well have flowed down denial.Fax_Benson
- set-15
- Part of Anger and Bargaining i think.ApeRobot
- Mass consensus and a multitude of measurable datapoints that form a bank of evidence (subject to re-interpretation if required) don't make any difference?detritus
- Of course they make a difference but this is a still a vastly hypocritical and shallow way of trying to rubbish this offset
- Not to mention pure denial of the evidenceset
- It does require explanation as to why, when faced with conclusions reached through use of the scientific method, some folk round here reject them without...Morning_star
- ...consideration. Instead, choosing their own dogma as 'gospel'.Morning_star
- ^ Well said. It's insanity.set
- You even copied my wink. How did you not see I was just playing with you man? I AM POINTING OUT exactly this. Haha.monospaced
- You called me out on trusting science. I was just doing the same. Difference is I’m not calling you a hypocrite for it. ;)monospaced
- I mean, did you get so stoned you don’t recognize I’m using your exact question and words back to you? lol, love you man. Please chill.monospaced
- I called you out on talking as if it was absolute fact when all you've done is read other people's research, right?set
- I've only ever said here that it's what I think is the most likely conclusion based on reading other people's research. Monumental difference, dude...set
- It was a joke!monospaced
- It's always a joke rightset
- doesnotexist6
this is going well