Logo Feedback
- Started
- Last post
- 20 Responses
- sem0
- AD130
- i_monk0
Irredeemable.
- doesnotexist0
is it a website only? i'd lose the .com
pick either the check or the heart or the stacked squares as the i, too many elements.
heart says dating site to me, so i'm already confused
punctuation isn't necessary in logos, only literature
- benfal990
oro red
- jaylarson0
way too much shit going on. tell them start over with a singular message to communicate, not 8+
- uan0
The tagline is ok
OTOREDi: drop all those treatements on the font, use any super grotesk font and fill with plain colors.
- feel0
i think the T on Oto is not completly clear, It can be confused with an R, unless its a very common work and its obviously an T.
The typography looks off between the gray and red letters, doesn't look like the same font.
The "i" in Redi is not clear too, I read RED the first time.And the tagline typography doesn't looks like is something for cars, I don't get why using a heart
- ORAZAL0
I think that starting this thread with "This is not my work" pretty much sums it up.
- dbloc0
it stays!
- dbloc0
Horrible™
- monospaced0
The T doesn't look like a T. The styling is very early '80s. Too many elements: check boxes (filled in ones make no sense), a random and unnecessary .com—is that an outlined heart!?
- lol yeah, who needs to put .com on anything? they should just assume you have a website. also google exists.sarahfailin
- are you being sarcastic?monospaced
- colin_s0
i've seen worse.
not many, but they exist.