Science
- Started
- Last post
- 1,010 Responses
- Morning_star0
It appears that a fair amount of 'science' is bullshit.
"He also looked at a number of well-regarded medical research findings, and found that, of 34 that had been retested, 41% had been contradicted or found to be significantly exaggerated."
"By some estimates, at least 51%—and as much as 89%—of published papers are based on studies and experiments showing results that cannot be reproduced."
- It's not bullshit. Science is in a constant state of evolution and the fact that 'science' is looking at this means it's on the right trackIanbolton
- It is. Scientists make lots of shit up and publish it. < Just read it. And if you want further reading look at the current crisis in psychology research.Morning_star
- I'm not arguing that the scientific method is under question. But the 'peer reviewed', 'published experiments' etc has clearly fallen foul of ego and dogma.Morning_star
- Cripes, i wonder how religionist texts would fare where the same tests are applied?detritus
- *weredetritus
- Are you suggesting that religionist texts contain rigorous research methods, peer reviewed results, transparent data and repeatable evidence?Morning_star
- It's fair to say that the retesting and contradictions, which were ultimately corrections, were, in fact, just more scientific process in action. Not bullshit.monospaced
- As i said, i'm not criticising the scientific method. I'm questioning HOW (when the scientific method is adopted) there is the amount of 'wrong stuff'...Morning_star
- ...published. Science should be transparent and agenda-less, it obviously isn't.Morning_star
- Big fucking surpriseset
- the amount of bullshit in science is too damn high!drgs
- Have to say science is problematic on many levels. The main issue is in the adoption post research, absolutes DO NOT exist in nature. Good scientists know this.fadein11
- Einstein died knowing this utterly broken. Our small minds have not evolved enough to understand the universe anything beyond the rudimentary. So certainfadein11
- members of the scientific community should perhaps behave with less arrogance. That being said as a methodology it's has proven v.effective.fadein11
- It's all about the incentives where there is intense pressure to produce a result...look at the researchers in Japan and South Korea that simply falsifiedyuekit
- major "discoveries."yuekit
- "science", "the scientific method", "scientists", and "the science industry" are all completely different thingsscarabin
- science has always been a high % of bullshit. Over time, doing more science proves the bullshit science wrong and then it stars again.Fax_Benson
- we thought this but it was wrong, so we've smashed up the lab and destroyed all the telescopes.Fax_Benson
- Agreed, science is flawed, but it's the best we got.drake-von-drake
- GeorgesII-1
- This changes everything.ORAZAL
- if it is on the Internet it must be truepablo28
- Old news.fadein11
- why are you upvoting this junk,
amazing what people would believeGeorgesII - Don't get your knickers in a twist darling. At what point did a single person say they believed it?set
- #positive #vibeyurimon
- upvote? why are you posting it?inteliboy
- bartholin is a lube gland, nowhere near the fallopians, doesn't even make sense. considering that we crossbred with the earlier hominids the questions of thegilgamush
- chicken or the egg is silly. but yes, every human starts as a woman when the haploid this and that does its thing. woman are the defaultgilgamush
- trolling successmonospaced
- intelli do you ever say anything constructive, at least I accepted my troll status, what is yours?georgesIII
- BAD VIBES ALERT!!!!BAD VIBES ALERT!!!!BAD VIBES ALERT!!!!BAD VIBES ALERT!!!!BAD VIBES ALERT!!!!yurimon
- ^case in pointsarahfailin
- I thought inteliboy made a valid point...set
- intelli is creating bad vibes. if I posted the same exact thing. i would be blamed for creating bad vibes. he is no exception. i have to disagree.yurimon
- https://c1.staticfli…gilgamush
- awe look, a cute little yurimon tantrummonospaced
- noice try,yurimon
- I agree with the negative vibes alert. See post of happy yet militant airplane gilgamush posted.CyBrainX
- Gnash4
Humans actually possess a protein (cryptochromes) needed for the detection of magnetic fields which they could theoretically sense, but it seems that our brain doesn't seem to have any way to decode this information
- maybe they didn't discover it yet...I recall a reading Aboriginals in Australia are known to always know where N,S,W,E is.uan
- they greet each other in the middle of the desert by saying which direction they are coming from. this might train / develop that capability from small age on.uan
- by designmonospaced
- @uan
Hidden Brain had an episode on it.
https://www.npr.org/…
It can be learned, I guess they're consistently keeping track at a low level.palimpsest - could also just be we know east/ west on sunrise/set and somehow our brains process the tweening in the background during the day:)uan
- didn't know hidden brain...tnx!uan
- I think if you were to kidnap one of them, knock them out and put them in a room without windows they wouldn't know what's where.palimpsest
- I reckon we all know at a subconscious level. Some are better at realising it.microkorg
- This explains why some people are really bad with navigation. ie my wife. She cant even make sense of google mapsBeeswax
- utopian6
Did the Mysterious 'Planet Nine' Tilt the Solar System?
In January, astronomers revealed evidence for the potential existence of another planet in the solar system. Researchers suggest that if this world — dubbed Planet Nine — exists, it could be about 10 times Earth's mass and orbit the sun at a distance about 500 times the distance from the Earth to the sun.
Previous research suggested that Planet Nine would possess a highly tilted orbit compared with the relatively thin, flat zone in which the eight official planets circle the sun. This led scientists to investigate whether Planet Nine's slant might help explain other tilting seen elsewhere in the solar system.
- Nibiru?PonyBoy
- Wormwood returnsset
- They've been talking about a possible "Planet X" forever.ETM
- And that must make it utterly untrue in your pea brain?set
- Was a bit drunk last night and assumed meaning in your post. You're right, they have been talking about it for ages. Since the beginning of humanity, in fact.set
- Since the beginning of humanity.monospaced
- Yes, since Sumer...set
- scarabin0
that's just science, y'all
- lol, flat earth shit is so goddamn fascinatingmonospaced
- "research it"... where do i startdrgs
- lol, sounds legitgeorgesIII
- here are 200 "proofs" earth is flat http://www.atlantean…scarabin
- All those pictures and videos from space are just CG. Don't believe the hype.jtb26
- Pure gold. I might go read more of their expanded proofs for fun later.monospaced
- Unfortunately I know at least two people who might believe this.Mattjanz3n
- That is awesome. I would love to meet one some day.monospaced
- Actually the ocean bends like that because of the earth's curvaturemekk
- That anyone in the 21st century believes the Earth is flat is mind-boggling. I need to wash the stupid off me.Continuity
- @Continuity OMG! really, dude? do you really have zero sense of humor in you?chukkaphob
- Err ... that's me ... humourless cunt, right here ...
¬_¬Continuity - Oh, I see, now. I'd just like to note that I don't think you're stupid or that you believe the Earth is flat, scarabin. Not by a long shot.Continuity
- Sorry if it seemed like that.Continuity
- haha. don't worry, it didn'tscarabin
- a rain drop takes on a curved shapehotroddy
- nb3
Why are you posting anti-vaccine nonsense in this thread? This is the Science thread. It is meant for science.
- thank you!monospaced
- science is an exploration, so it stays. muy bienyurimon
- i thought you said it was a belief systemscarabin
- No sabía que hablabas español, ahora entiendo porque tienes problemas con el inglés.ORAZAL
- "Órale"!zenmasterfoo
- portada oy conyoyurimon
- Six-year-old diagnosed with first case of diphtheria in Spain since 1986
http://elpais.com/el…Gnash - "science is an exploration" -yurimon
i'm happy to see our efforts haven't been wasted on you. there's hope for you yet.scarabin - but sometimes its a beliefyurimon
- no, science is a process, only its outcomes are beliefs, but they are at least backed up!monospaced
- Yawnset
- i take it back. you're a lost cause.scarabin
- Morning_star4
Yuri
Should we trust these people without question?
Meryl Nass is not an expert in childhood vaccines:
Meryl Nass is a doctor of internal medicine and an expert on bioterrorism, biodefense, anthrax and anthrax vaccine injuries. She has testified before Congress on the subjects of Gulf War illness, anthrax vaccines and bioterrorism. Her blog and anthrax-information websites can be found at AnthraxVaccine.org.Sherri Tenpenny is a fraud:
is an American physician and anti-vaccination activist from Ohio. She has claimed that vaccines cause autism, asthma, ADHD and autoimmune disorders.[1] The author of four books on anti-vaccination, her 2015 lecture tour of Australia was cancelled due to public outcry over her views on vaccination which go against established scientific consensus.Suzanne Humphries is not an expert:
is a nephrologist (kidney doctor. She has written several blog posts and done several podcasts and interviews insinuating that kidney failure is caused by vaccines.[1][2] Humphries uses this purely anecdotal, unstudied, "feeling" of vaccines' role in kidney disease to try and justify why her complete lack of training in any relevant field of immunology or vaccines doesn't disqualify her as an "expert" on the topic.- I wonder about that, same time I think they get traction from people who get damaged from vaccines. the movement in question by itself is not without concernyurimon
- only people i seen start to question is those who suffer after vaccination.yurimon
- you actually know adults who are getting vaccines?monospaced
- did vaccines make you retarded, yuri?scarabin
- lolmoldero
- mostly children, they develop allergies after. some more severe then others. after vaccination. 1 or 2 weeks into it. some recognize the coincidence some dont.yurimon
- i know 1 adult died from flu vaccineyurimon
- children do develop allergies, but you are seeing it as causation when it is ONLY coincidencemonospaced
- everytime after a vaccine? some get asthma... maybe the quality isnt there like used to be.yurimon
- it's not every time you fucknutmonospaced
- ok get tb shot, 1 -2 weeks get allergies or asthma, not everyone but an increasing popullationyurimon
- I don't know where you are getting your info but that's just a flat out lie. There's no indication whatsoever of an increase and you know it.monospaced
- Also if you're so fucking convinced then why do you not know if its allergies or asthma? And is this specific to TB vax or are you just guessing? Dude.monospaced
- No vaccinations here and no allergies :-)formed
- Vaccinations here and no allergies either. Also a significantly higher chance of not dying from polio, so at least theres that. ;)monospaced
- Of course it's OK to not have vaccinations, because you are going to be protected by the vast majority of idiots that do. #sarcasmORAZAL
- Sad but true. Also you put everyone else at risk by not being vaccinated.monospaced
- you dont know if thats a true statement. not all vaccines work. example is some vaccines dont contain what they are meant to vaccinated for,yurimon
- Morning_star4
Yuri
EVERY. SINGLE. TIME. you post something about vaccinations within seconds i have found reliable sources that offer evidence that contradict your claims.
Regarding the HPV article, in the comments was this:
1. There were 919 cervical cancer deaths in the UK in 2012.
2. Every one of those deaths were 100% preventable.
3. You are comparing the cancer rates PER YEAR to alleged HPV reactions (which would only happen ONCE, not every year.)
4. If your reported 10% was real then the total number of people having serious adverse reactions out of 100,000 would be more than 30,000 i.e. In every single school of 300 girls that were vaccinated 100 of those girls would have had a "serious" reactionIt seems that, unsurprisingly, the newspaper article is not balanced or well researched. Yet, you are willing to offer it as some kind of credible evidence of conspiracy without any effort to put your claims in context or search out authoritative alternative sources. Its just comes across as myopic, lazy and paranoid. Raise your game.
- so truemonospaced
- I dont see why refer to it as such when my own observation is an increase of people who are getting sick from vaccines. its observable fact.yurimon
- exhibit A. before 2004
no ones children exhibiting side effects after vaccines.
now, people's children exhibiting side effects after vaccines.yurimon - who? how many? even if you're not flat out lying it's hardly enough to discredit vaccinations.scarabin
- IT TOOK 5 SECONDS.
"The MMR vaccine controversy started with the 1998 publication..."Morning_star - it's common knowledge many don't feel well following a flu shot. this isn't cause for alarm.scarabin
- Its not just the feeling well. alot of people develop allergies mostly. Who knows whats up with autism. im not saying vaccines dont work.yurimon
- just something to think about especially whats under reported. its a noticeable number.yurimon
- No it isn't. If you read my initial link to Science Based Medicine it explains ALL of your concerns.Morning_star
- The fact is people can't here evidence or information that conflicts their belief without getting upset. Me included. We have lost the ability to be openHayoth
- And consider we might be wrong.Hayoth
- i hear what you are saying. I am still open to either side i havent made up my mind.yurimon
- Yuri. You a doctor? Where are you observing people getting sick after vaccinations? More anecdotal evidence, eh?ETM
- Science1
The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.
- oh god we're going to have all sorts of shitty spoof accounts now aren't weset
- well considering it says "invited by ____" next to the new username, this will be short livedmoldero
- Touché QBNmoldero
- It would be weird if something was only true if you believed in it.qoob
- I suspect there're a few QBNers who live by that creed, qoob.detritus
- Thus why mostly everything in science is called a theory. say about 90-80%
dont forget its occult origins btw.yurimon - Also, what was scientifically true last week, may not be scientifically true this week.Morning_star
- there is true science and political motivated science which is design for outcome not truth like pr.yurimon
- ^^ that's the beauty of it. We're not sure of anything! If we're wrong, we'll adjust.ESKEMA
- But you really need to convince me your new theory is better, otherwise I'll stick to what I have now!ESKEMA
- Scientific theories are not to be confused with hypotheses, yurimon. They are far closer to "laws" than "theories."monospaced
- A theory is a hypothesis that goes through extremely rigorous testing, and becomes a solid theory to base future science on.monospaced
- Theory: a supposition intended to explain something
Supposition: a belief held without proof or certain knowledge; an assumption or hypothesis.Morning_star - Religion: truth, like that flood story and 7k year old earth.moldero
- Nice try, Morning_star, but those definitions are in the wrong context entirely.monospaced
- A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method and repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation.monospaced
- A hypothesis is a suggested solution for an unexplained occurrence that does not fit into current accepted scientific theory. The basic idea of a hypothesis is that there is no pre-determined outcome. For a hypothesis to be termed a scientific hypothesis, it has to be something that can be supported or refuted through carefully crafted experimentation or observation. This is called falsifiability and testability, according to the Encyclopedia Britannica.monospaced
- @Moldero - You're asserting that because 'Science' is under scrutiny, it follows that those scrutinising it promote 'Religion' is an alternative. I've seen no..Morning_star
- ...evidence of this here, ever.Morning_star
- @Monospaced - We seem to be debating semantics again. Which, as we've seen before, is largely fruitless. You got anything better ;)Morning_star
- lol, we are certainly not debating semantics, you are simply using incorrect definitions to make a feeble pointmonospaced
- you used the wrong version of the definitions of words to fuck up semantics, which is really a huge discredit to your arguing abilitiesmonospaced
- Dawkins version of evolution is obsolete. /end.
its ironic.. Dawkins believes in evolution n denied natural selection by that chic.yurimon - @mono - missing the point as usual.Morning_star
- No I'm not. We're right on point, and you made a weak argument with bad data and I'm sorry I had to point that out. Theories simply are closer to facts.monospaced
- No need to apologise. My point: regardless of the definition, theories are not facts. I'm still waiting for my one fact about DarkMatter.Morning_star
- Fact, Dark matter exists. Also, scientific theories are chalk full of facts.monospaced
- That is my point, and "the" point.monospaced
- Dark matter is without definition. We know nothing about its nature. It's nothing but a name. Fact.Morning_star
- Creationism anyone?utopian
- scarabin1
yurimon goes to the museum
- Haha, you wish.yurimon
- :)scarabin
- She has to be one of the most annoying and ignorant people i have ever had the displeasure to listen to._niko
- watching this, i just want to keep asking her over and over again, "Are you retarded?"_niko
- No need to askset
- she's hlariousGnash
- this is how I imagine yurimon's thought process when confronted with scientific conclusions on realitymonospaced
- lolorganicgrid
- HAHAHAmoldero
- This shit is soo good!moldero
- World's Thickest Cunt™detritus
- sofakingback2
Just watched this episode. Has a lot of good info. on the current state of climate change. Its insane how people don't believe in climate change. Its exactly what happened with tobacco companies. How fucking stupid are we as a species?!?!?
- indeedfadein11
- it's only the 'man-made' part that some people disagree with, not climate change as a wholeGnash
- Science deniers and people tied to the polluting industries completely disagree. Including trumps cabinet picks for the EPA and education. Sad.monospaced
- Oh and don't forget those people who believe only god can change the climate and that only prayer and burning fossil fuels will save us.monospaced
- 85% of americans agree the earth is getting warmer. 49% believe caused mostly by human activity. only 11% think no evidence its getting warmerGnash
- well... everything is natural, even 'man made' - because where else in the universe has it come from if not from earth. man-made = changed. So...fruitsalad
- You can view earth as some sort of chowder soup, made up of various ingredients. man is merely stirring it a bit quick that it'd naturally churn around.fruitsalad
- @Gnash, sadly those numbers align with the amount of science deniers out there. I believe it's close to 100% of the scientific community agrees it's man-made.monospaced
- it's certainly the majority. according to PEW 84% of scientists say the earth is warming because of human activity.Gnash
- Yeah, so why does someone believe an oil company when they deny it?monospaced
- climate change deniers are more of a threat than climate change itself, because we can actually work to reverse itmoldero
- maybe because they own oil stocksGnash
- lol @Gnash, that's a funny joke
https://cdn.arstechn…
http://media.treehug…monospaced - lol. okay, maybe not those guysGnash
- nice f'ing ride, thoughGnash
- I didn't watch the doc but the evidence is there that all planets in our solar system are changing at a similar rate...set
- ... So climate change exists but we're not responsible. That doesn't mean we don't need to change though as we're obviously destroying the planet.set
- I guess what I mean is 'that would suggest' rather than talking in facts that I have no idea about.. ;)set
- Well, we're not destroying the planet, the planet is fine, it can survive anything we can dish out. We are destroying our livable environment. zero f's givensofakingback
- Well sure, but we're destroying precious rainforests, for ex. , which destroys the atmosphere, which affects all life. But yes, it'll grow back once we're gone.set
- And ultimately if we stop our destruction and go completely sustainable and green, we're not doing it for the planet, we're doing it for ourselves.set
- utopian6
A team of researchers using telescopes in space and on Earth announced a new haul of about 100 previously undiscovered alien planets on Monday.
104 newfound alien planets confirmed
The cosmic "treasure trove" was revealed using data from NASA's Kepler Space Telescope and other observatories on Earth, according to a statement from the Keck Observatory in Hawaii, which was one of the telescopes that helped corroborate the planetary discoveries.
These newly confirmed worlds will now be added to the approximately 3,300 planets we know of outside the solar system.
- STILL not a belief systemmonospaced
- keckekeksarahfailin
- What makes them "alien"yuekit
- Not in our solar system.monospaced
- Morning_star3
I found this very interesting and opinion changing, the truth IS out there.
Eight Lies About GMOs
1. The health consequences of eating genetically modified organisms are largely unknown.
2. Food items that contain GMOs are unlabeled in America.
3. Genetic engineering reduces genetic diversity.
4. Once the mutant genes are out of the bag, there is no going back.
5. GMOs are not the answer for global food security.
6. Genetically engineered foods have not been proven to be safe, but the few studies conducted don’t look so hot.
7. Big biotech firms have very sketchy track records.
8. GMOs require massive amounts of pesticides, herbicides and fungicides.Conclusion:
If there were a real controversy about GMOs, there would be credible sources citing credible studies and making valid points. Anti-GMO sites would not have to resort to discredited studies from dubious sources, or making tired-old claims that have been debunked as often as creationist arguments.- +1monospaced
- GMOs are bad mmkay?
9/11 was an inside job
Fuck You Candy
Vote Bernie Sandersimbecile - my house burned down this morning_niko
- my flat burned down this morning,
and it burns down at least once a year.
I have pics to prove it.Drumpf - Right or wrong, this is how I feel about GMO.MrT
- have you ever eaten a real banana? (not that engineered yellow one) or a real original tomato? your fear is a better business than my drug consumption :)sted
- that engineered yellow one, I hate to break it to you, IS a real banana in every waymonospaced
- utopian0
A nearby black hole just erupted for the first time in 26 years and scientists are ecstatic.
- great, here come the Chitauri.kona
- Literally on our doorstep!Ianbolton
- so if gravity is so strong that even light cant escape it, that makes gravity faster than the speed of light right?moldero
- I've never heard gravity described as having a speed.monospaced
- The strength of the gravity created by the super dense singularity is what 'captures' the light. Light particles are effected by gravity throughout the...Morning_star
- ...universe. In the case of a black hole the gravitatonal force is so great, particles of light cannot break free.Morning_star
- Gravity is the product of mass and speed. So with enough mass speed gets negatedgilgamush
- Some of my books starting falling off my shelves.face_melter
- how is gravity a product of speed?monospaced
- yeah, what gilgamush said is false.sarahfailin
- not false. for instance the speed of the earths rotation creates centripetal forcegilgamush
- newton's second law brobrogilgamush
- It's not literally on our doorstep is it. It's the exact opposite of literally on our doorstep... lolset
- That's NOT Newton's 2nd Law, and centripetal force is NOT the same as gravity, not even a little. Earth's MASS creates gravity and inward force.monospaced
- Umm, no one knows how gravity is created...set
- correct, but we certainly know where its source is: mass :)monospaced
- Weight squared = gravity over speed of rotation. Nobody said they were the same dummy. They affect each other thoughgilgamush
- the earth's rotation doesn't affect the gravitation pull, which stays constant... please don't call me a "dummy."monospaced
- well i just explained the relationship why it does soooooogilgamush
- uan4
I think 2 new models of reality emerged online in the last weeks. I don't know if they are compatible nor claim to understand any of this yet, but both claim to provide an understanding of some kind of source code of the universe and conscience.
Eric Weinstein
Geometric Unityand
Stephen Wolfram
Wolfram Physics Project:
Path to the Fundamental Theory of Physics- +1 Both Eric and Brett Weinstein rock.
Brett and his wife are doing a really insightful Covid19 live podcast that is utterly fascinating https://www.youtube.…Morning_star - Thanks for this, Gonna catch this episode later. just finishing The Portal no.27 which is mind blowing.Morning_star
- NiceGnash
- Wolfram might really be on to something this time! He explains basically everything, but the new stuff doesn't make predictions and otherscientists are spookedgrafician
- Interesting although I'd be curious how other physicists view this...Wolfram is known for coming up with idiosyncratic ideas that get talked about in the pressyuekit
- but not necessarily accepted by other scientists.yuekit
- +1 Both Eric and Brett Weinstein rock.
- detritus3
Life on Earth may have started as early as 4.3Bn years ago...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/201…
Looks like the 'deep sea vent' hypothesis for the emergence of life wins out now too.
Next stop — Europa.
- bull. god hadn't even turned on the lights yetGnash
- Don't let the religious folks know this.utopian
- If religious people didn't think so small, they could say god created the big bang and guides the creation of all living things in the universe.sofakingback
- Everything in the universe is made of the same elements. it would be so easy to just credit god for it. But no, he's a white dude in sandals. hates dino dna.sofakingback
- if so, then why focus on a handful of tribes in a desert, thousands of years ago, on one planet among countless others in the universe?monospaced
- if so what? what are you fired up about here? lol are you asking me to explain how jesus works??? I don't know, I don't believe in god, go ask a priest.sofakingback
- What I'm saying is, you can tack the big bang and evolution on to creation, as for picking a certain people, why not? Its a bullshit story anyway. make it up.sofakingback
- Its just a thought. I don't feel passionately about an opinion I crafted in 2.5 seconds. So save your arguing powers for something else. lolsofakingback
- I bet the first thing we find on Europa is some weird disease that fucks everyone up. Humans are such meddling little bastards!Ianbolton
- I bet the first thing we find on Europa is some weird disease that fucks everyone up. Humans are such meddling little bastards!Ianbolton
- Things were so much easier when we thought God did everything. Meant we could focus on how much wine to drinkIanbolton
- you seriously need to chill out sofa, just pointing out how we agree the very concept you proposed falls apart instantly once reason is applied.monospaced
- Just as easily as the bullshit made up jeebus crap. Peace.monospaced
- Says the guy that nukes over everything, Including this post. lol. I like you tho, you're just a little extra. ;)sofakingback
- I don't nuke over very thing g and certainly not this post in any way, not like your reaction to my innocent comment.monospaced
- I'm a little extra what? You're insulting me again for what? Holy shit you need to relax because you're clearly triggered into nuclear territory. Chill!monospaced
- I was not and am not fired up. read again.monospaced
- lol. you're fine.sofakingback
- sarahfailin4
ALIEN CASINOS- lolgilgamush
- would be cool if it was molten lavamonospaced
- It's more likely ice or some reflective material. The animated gif shows they dim as they reach the horizon.IRNlun6
- wordmonospaced
- the eggheads said the colour wasn't right for volcanoes. this is pretty cool.Gnash
- It was just something that crossed my mind.monospaced
