Public Voice Network
- Hannibal TV series 77
- Vid of the Day 1529915299
- PS4 vs X-Box One 4848
- Video Games... 998998
- Pic of the Day 7542575425
- FMT140613 1616
- This typeface - Terminal? 33
- blog 5785657856
- RIP James Gandolfini 3434
- Suggest a good movie... 12291229
- Four tet is Burial 1818
- I am Bradley Manning 1717
- Trailer Of The Day 818818
- RIP Tony Soprano 66
- instagram 673673
- QBN Stickers? 55
- Chick of the Day 1831218312
- The Million Dollar YouTub… 2222
- Drumming World Record 1010
- Superman: Man of Steel 6767
- QBNTPhE 2013 108108
- US State Outlines? 1212
- EC: David Rudnick 22
- Black People :/ 191191
Use of stock vectors 1212 Responses
Last post: 10 months, 2 weeks ago | Thread started: Aug 7, 12, 7:05 a.m.
- jagara
Hey,
used a stock vector illustration as part of a logo. I have tons of these, some i got from friends, some i actually paid for.
But i haven't kept track of which ones i own...
Should i worry about licences on this sort of thing? Or does nobody care?
I also recombined several images to form a single one. Is that illegal? The legal info on shutterstock for intsnce, says nothing about this..
Thoughts on this?
Thanks :)
- Aug 7, 12, 7:05 a.m. – Permalink
- doesnotexist
can you recognize the original from yours?

- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:08 a.m. – Permalink
- monospaced
you should be ashamed of yourself?

- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:11 a.m. – Permalink
- Fax_Benson
If it no longer looks exactly like the original and you combined it with custom type then I'm sure it's fine.


- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:22 a.m. – Permalink
- jagara
@Fax_Benson that's what I've been thinking.
Have any of you ever heard of stock image (or font-) companies making enquiries about licenses? I see it as HIGHLY unlikely (unless you're like a multinational corporation using their work).
I still worry, though (hence this thread)...


- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:35 a.m. – Permalink
- doesnotexist
as long as you've changed it in some way you should be good.
but seriously... why did you do this in the first place?!

- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:39 a.m. – Permalink
- Fax_Benson
I don't know for sure but I don't think they're interested - probably down to the sheer volume of stock files out there. Lots of the cheaper stock seem to be recycled anyway. If it's a complex, one-off illustration from a stock illustration site, the licenses might be different.

- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:41 a.m. – Permalink
- mantrakid
dont want to spark any paranoia, but depending on the stock site you got it from, they have explicit legal info about using it for corporate identity work. IE you cant create a 'brand' out of the stock image / illustration / etc. It shitty legal ground you're treading...


- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:56 a.m. – Permalink
- Fax_Benson
I was assuming you'd bought it.


- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 8:30 a.m. – Permalink


