Public Voice Network
- FMT170513 1818
- Cape Cod 99
- the gif animation thread 1848818488
- Technological Eye Strain 88
- London machete attack 6262
- Vid of the Day 1507715077
- this style of photography… 1010
- Looking to source IA...
- Been asked to do a legal … 2020
- Old Mac Pro G5 55
- Official NSFW Thread 260260
- PHP Help
- DaftPunk 213213
- Pic of the Day 7478174781
- I ❤ Wood 335335
- ☮ WTF 44
- What are you listening to… 55915591
- Game of the Day 1414
- Flat Design 162162
- New BOC 3030
- Dickson Poon 2020
- Chick of the Day 1825418254
- weird 3d stuff 9494
- Game of Thrones 301301
Use of stock vectors 1212 Responses
Last post: 9 months, 2 weeks ago | Thread started: Aug 7, 12, 7:05 a.m.
- jagara
Hey,
used a stock vector illustration as part of a logo. I have tons of these, some i got from friends, some i actually paid for.
But i haven't kept track of which ones i own...
Should i worry about licences on this sort of thing? Or does nobody care?
I also recombined several images to form a single one. Is that illegal? The legal info on shutterstock for intsnce, says nothing about this..
Thoughts on this?
Thanks :)
- Aug 7, 12, 7:05 a.m. – Permalink
- doesnotexist
can you recognize the original from yours?

- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:08 a.m. – Permalink
- monospaced
you should be ashamed of yourself?

- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:11 a.m. – Permalink
- Fax_Benson
If it no longer looks exactly like the original and you combined it with custom type then I'm sure it's fine.


- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:22 a.m. – Permalink
- jagara
@Fax_Benson that's what I've been thinking.
Have any of you ever heard of stock image (or font-) companies making enquiries about licenses? I see it as HIGHLY unlikely (unless you're like a multinational corporation using their work).
I still worry, though (hence this thread)...


- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:35 a.m. – Permalink
- doesnotexist
as long as you've changed it in some way you should be good.
but seriously... why did you do this in the first place?!

- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:39 a.m. – Permalink
- Fax_Benson
I don't know for sure but I don't think they're interested - probably down to the sheer volume of stock files out there. Lots of the cheaper stock seem to be recycled anyway. If it's a complex, one-off illustration from a stock illustration site, the licenses might be different.

- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:41 a.m. – Permalink
- mantrakid
dont want to spark any paranoia, but depending on the stock site you got it from, they have explicit legal info about using it for corporate identity work. IE you cant create a 'brand' out of the stock image / illustration / etc. It shitty legal ground you're treading...


- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:56 a.m. – Permalink
- Fax_Benson
I was assuming you'd bought it.


- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 8:30 a.m. – Permalink


