Public Voice Network
- Paid vacation? 2626
- weird 3d stuff 9696
- The Purge 2020
- QBN Personas
- blog 5771357713
- Hiphop like this. 7474
- DaftPunk 224224
- the gif animation thread 1849618496
- CSS z-Index 11
- Pic of the Day 7478974789
- Cape Cod 1414
- Technological Eye Strain 1717
- Best American band of all… 127127
- Bitcoin 130130
- Viewing Old PC Hard Drive… 55
- QBN EXPATS 4141
- Architecture of the Day 436436
- Cool tumblr themes? 1010
- Cool Topic-Specific Websi… 22
- You're Doing It Wrong… 77
- Vid of the Day 1507815078
- this style of photography… 1212
- Vine of the Day 1212
- Product Photographers, LA… 11
Use of stock vectors 1212 Responses
Last post: 9 months, 2 weeks ago | Thread started: Aug 7, 12, 7:05 a.m.
- jagara
Hey,
used a stock vector illustration as part of a logo. I have tons of these, some i got from friends, some i actually paid for.
But i haven't kept track of which ones i own...
Should i worry about licences on this sort of thing? Or does nobody care?
I also recombined several images to form a single one. Is that illegal? The legal info on shutterstock for intsnce, says nothing about this..
Thoughts on this?
Thanks :)
- Aug 7, 12, 7:05 a.m. – Permalink
- doesnotexist
can you recognize the original from yours?

- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:08 a.m. – Permalink
- monospaced
you should be ashamed of yourself?

- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:11 a.m. – Permalink
- Fax_Benson
If it no longer looks exactly like the original and you combined it with custom type then I'm sure it's fine.


- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:22 a.m. – Permalink
- jagara
@Fax_Benson that's what I've been thinking.
Have any of you ever heard of stock image (or font-) companies making enquiries about licenses? I see it as HIGHLY unlikely (unless you're like a multinational corporation using their work).
I still worry, though (hence this thread)...


- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:35 a.m. – Permalink
- doesnotexist
as long as you've changed it in some way you should be good.
but seriously... why did you do this in the first place?!

- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:39 a.m. – Permalink
- Fax_Benson
I don't know for sure but I don't think they're interested - probably down to the sheer volume of stock files out there. Lots of the cheaper stock seem to be recycled anyway. If it's a complex, one-off illustration from a stock illustration site, the licenses might be different.

- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:41 a.m. – Permalink
- mantrakid
dont want to spark any paranoia, but depending on the stock site you got it from, they have explicit legal info about using it for corporate identity work. IE you cant create a 'brand' out of the stock image / illustration / etc. It shitty legal ground you're treading...


- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:56 a.m. – Permalink
- Fax_Benson
I was assuming you'd bought it.


- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 8:30 a.m. – Permalink


