Public Voice Network
- Music Video of the Day 22
- Video Games... 993993
- Pic of the Day 7541475414
- Halp! I need a photograph… 4242
- WTF 11
- Beer of the day 133133
- Suggest some new Metal 8484
- PRISM 9090
- Vid of the Day 1529515295
- Retro Dunk Idea 1616
- the gif animation thread 1880318803
- Wordpress Not Showing Up 1212
- iPhone lenses 88
- Black People :/ 189189
- How to Uninstall McAfee A… 33
- blog 5785357853
- Outlook more like Mac Mai… 11
- NBA Finals 2013 4141
- Official Infographics Thr… 181181
- Mac Pro 9797
- Responsive Web Design &am… 1111
- Portfolio | London Bound 1111
- Ibiza 2013 88
- Waterproof Camera for a k… 55
Use of stock vectors 1212 Responses
Last post: 10 months, 2 weeks ago | Thread started: Aug 7, 12, 7:05 a.m.
- jagara
Hey,
used a stock vector illustration as part of a logo. I have tons of these, some i got from friends, some i actually paid for.
But i haven't kept track of which ones i own...
Should i worry about licences on this sort of thing? Or does nobody care?
I also recombined several images to form a single one. Is that illegal? The legal info on shutterstock for intsnce, says nothing about this..
Thoughts on this?
Thanks :)
- Aug 7, 12, 7:05 a.m. – Permalink
- doesnotexist
can you recognize the original from yours?

- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:08 a.m. – Permalink
- monospaced
you should be ashamed of yourself?

- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:11 a.m. – Permalink
- Fax_Benson
If it no longer looks exactly like the original and you combined it with custom type then I'm sure it's fine.


- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:22 a.m. – Permalink
- jagara
@Fax_Benson that's what I've been thinking.
Have any of you ever heard of stock image (or font-) companies making enquiries about licenses? I see it as HIGHLY unlikely (unless you're like a multinational corporation using their work).
I still worry, though (hence this thread)...


- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:35 a.m. – Permalink
- doesnotexist
as long as you've changed it in some way you should be good.
but seriously... why did you do this in the first place?!

- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:39 a.m. – Permalink
- Fax_Benson
I don't know for sure but I don't think they're interested - probably down to the sheer volume of stock files out there. Lots of the cheaper stock seem to be recycled anyway. If it's a complex, one-off illustration from a stock illustration site, the licenses might be different.

- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:41 a.m. – Permalink
- mantrakid
dont want to spark any paranoia, but depending on the stock site you got it from, they have explicit legal info about using it for corporate identity work. IE you cant create a 'brand' out of the stock image / illustration / etc. It shitty legal ground you're treading...


- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:56 a.m. – Permalink
- Fax_Benson
I was assuming you'd bought it.


- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 8:30 a.m. – Permalink


