Public Voice Network
- Game of Thrones 301301
- Dickson Poon 1919
- ☮ WTF 33
- Boys Scouts of America 66
- making beats 165165
- Pic of the Day 7477374773
- Game of the Day 1313
- Official NSFW Thread 257257
- Gay thread 125125
- this style of photography… 88
- the gif animation thread 1848318483
- Cape Cod 77
- Show some recent work 55605560
- Best Free VST plugins... 55
- Amy's Baking Company 115115
- I ❤ Wood 334334
- Chick of the Day 1825318253
- religion 222222
- Been asked to do a legal … 1717
- London machete attack 5151
- Vid of the Day 1507515075
- The Guitar Thread 9999
- Show your latest Pics 39383938
- DaftPunk 211211
Use of stock vectors 1212 Responses
Last post: 9 months, 2 weeks ago | Thread started: Aug 7, 12, 7:05 a.m.
- jagara
Hey,
used a stock vector illustration as part of a logo. I have tons of these, some i got from friends, some i actually paid for.
But i haven't kept track of which ones i own...
Should i worry about licences on this sort of thing? Or does nobody care?
I also recombined several images to form a single one. Is that illegal? The legal info on shutterstock for intsnce, says nothing about this..
Thoughts on this?
Thanks :)
- Aug 7, 12, 7:05 a.m. – Permalink
- doesnotexist
can you recognize the original from yours?

- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:08 a.m. – Permalink
- monospaced
you should be ashamed of yourself?

- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:11 a.m. – Permalink
- Fax_Benson
If it no longer looks exactly like the original and you combined it with custom type then I'm sure it's fine.


- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:22 a.m. – Permalink
- jagara
@Fax_Benson that's what I've been thinking.
Have any of you ever heard of stock image (or font-) companies making enquiries about licenses? I see it as HIGHLY unlikely (unless you're like a multinational corporation using their work).
I still worry, though (hence this thread)...


- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:35 a.m. – Permalink
- doesnotexist
as long as you've changed it in some way you should be good.
but seriously... why did you do this in the first place?!

- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:39 a.m. – Permalink
- Fax_Benson
I don't know for sure but I don't think they're interested - probably down to the sheer volume of stock files out there. Lots of the cheaper stock seem to be recycled anyway. If it's a complex, one-off illustration from a stock illustration site, the licenses might be different.

- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:41 a.m. – Permalink
- mantrakid
dont want to spark any paranoia, but depending on the stock site you got it from, they have explicit legal info about using it for corporate identity work. IE you cant create a 'brand' out of the stock image / illustration / etc. It shitty legal ground you're treading...


- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 7:56 a.m. – Permalink
- Fax_Benson
I was assuming you'd bought it.


- Dog-earAug 7, 12, 8:30 a.m. – Permalink


