Romney???
- Started
- Last post
- 842 Responses
- utopian0
Is Romney a:
1) Moron
2) Mormon
3) or both- he's a Mormonmonospaced
- Moronmon@utopian
- He is a Mor(m)on.CygnusZero4
- He's a Mormon. But the second 'm' got outsourced.ETM
- Isn't spelled Merman?WrappedInBooks
- monolith0
A liberal, a conservative and a libertarian walk in to a bar.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The bartender says, "what'll ya have Mitt?"
- monospaced0
- no moron would come up with something this smartmonospaced
- whhipp0
@ mikotondria3- That was fair assessment, I appreciate your candor.
- ernexbcn0
I hope he doesn't win.
- chossy0
You would think they could have taken those three hay bails out of the wide shot eh? that's just sloppy.
- utopian0
- http://i.imgur.com/G…utopian
- where does this come from?chrisRG
- Looks like the Whitehouse gfx. Very nice though, great typog and color.mikotondria3
- http://news.yahoo.co…utopian
- whhipp0
ETM I understand how it is interpreted "Separation of church and state" and how it is incorporated, however I feel this interpretation is wrongly used in everyday thinking. People have heard it over and over they seem to think it is written in the Bill of Rights that way. No it hasn't and still isn't. The courts have observed Thomas Jeffersons words in a letter he wrote to further distinguish the First Amendment.
That being said, I feel mg33, to whom I was commenting to, doesn't understand what it means when he was quoting the famous words "separation of church and state" with a polling center being in a church as unconstitutional.
I feel this interpretation of "separation of church and state" has become perverse, it does not mean the removal of all Christian theism in our public domain. Which, unfortunately to some, is our heritage. It is the interpretation that is the problem. It was meant to keep government out of the church's business, not the removal of church in government's business.
- You have literally no idea about how the separation has ever been ruled on, by Supreme Courts, etc, have you ?mikotondria3
- I do, but its wrongly interpreted.whhipp
- IMO.whhipp
- Well you're stuck with what everyone else thinks it means and how they rule, so suck it up and start your own country.mikotondria3
- "Welcome to Whippland."mg33
- Whhippland, that has a nice ring to it!whhipp
- You LITERALLY have it backward whhipp. It's to keep religion out of government completely.monospaced
- monolith0
It's funny how whipp is silent like a little twerp.. if Obama had any ties with a company that made American workers take down the American flag and raise a fucking Chinese one (little less makes 8 million dollars of it like Romney does), can you IMAGINE his outrage and patriotism?
- i approve this message.necromation
- quit worrying about whipp/popfodders etc.inteliboy
- TheBlueOne0
Re: pitching politics at a corporation. Well, the thing that has always made the US capitalist machine function is the role of civil society supporting the corporate / state messaging. In fact, the role and the use of civil society as a means to transmit corporate propaganda IS the main reason US politics looks and operates the way it does.
Look at it this way, you can go to your local school board and say "Hey, I'd like to run a free 'Young Entrepreneur' seminar for the kids?"
That'd probably go down really well. Nods all around, the local small business coalition would probably send you materials to use, hell Coke might even get on board and supply refreshments.
No go and say "Hey, I'd like to do a seminar for the High Schoolers on the history of worker's rights and how to organize a union." and see what support happens.
- *expects whhipp to start blustering here ->TheBlueOne
- schools and unions... ummm yeah thats a combination that doesnt go together. yeah right dude.whhipp
- And look who lives up to the ideological stereotype and misses the point. *slow clapTheBlueOne
- So workers rights = unamerican; capitalist exploitation = "America, fuck yeah!"TheBlueOne
- Got it douchenozzle.TheBlueOne
- fuck yeah!!! shit stereotype from your side.whhipp
- ETM0
Romney's tax cuts will either be a lie or will screw America worse. As has been said before, corporate profits are already at a record high and their are more millionaires and billionaires then ever before. But only one thing trickles down in the new global economy, and sadly it's not the jobs or money. At least not in your country.
It would be great if Obama actually instituted the tax cuts he claims for companies that employ and manufacture in the USA. If that happened and the tax cuts were worth while, you could see a shift at the levels that your country needs.
As for Romney's 47% comment, he really doesn't understand how society functions. There MUST be people at all levels to make society work He should know more than anyone that there needs to be people to park his cars, wash his cars, cook his meals, wait on him in restaurants, clean and press his suits. They will likely NEVER cross over to the 53%. That's okay. They are valuable members to society and they contribute, even if it's not all with dollars in the government coffers.
- Argh... I did the reverse there/their error. Their = there.ETM
- aaux0
S are all republicans basically resigned to voting for this guy simply because he's the GOP's pick at this point? Not actually based on any particular quality that would make him a good president?
- He is the most sane!!chossy
- yes, aaux, pretty muchmonospaced
- are you being sarcastic, chossy?monospaced
- I hope so, because only someone insane would believe Mormon dogma and doctrine.monospaced
- Re-read this time pay attention to syntax. You mad man.chossy
- "He is the most sane!!"
What syntax am I confusing? Are you serious or sarcastic about this?monospaced - Also don't blow on the embers monospaced you will only get burnt... you retard.chossy
- just answer me, sarcastic or not? what embers? What have i said that makes me seem retarded?monospaced
- and why must you resort to childish name calling instead of actually discussing? it's very unbecomingmonospaced
- Perhaps the most sane member of the republican party? I would say Huntsman closest they have.aaux
- Most sane of any of the Republican frontrunners. Huntsman was sane, which is why he never had a chancelocustsloth
- yurimon0
I pasted this here because of the flip flop factor.
Only thought it was appropriate.
2 flip flopper candidates.. one presidency.