Public Voice Network
- I am Bradley Manning 88
- RIP James Gandolfini 2020
- RIP Tony Soprano 44
- Drumming World Record 55
- Video Games... 997997
- Black People :/ 191191
- US State Outlines? 1111
- PRISM 9191
- Spoonerism of the day 3636
- Package Design 11
- Four tet is Burial 1414
- a screen printed, black-l… 22
- Pic of the Day 7541775417
- PS4 vs X-Box One 4747
- The Million Dollar YouTub… 2020
- Chick of the Day 1831118311
- Waterproof Camera for a k… 66
- the gif animation thread 1880418804
- Music Videos 624624
- Jr-Mid Level Designer - S… 44
- Mid-Sr Level Designer NYC 88
- EC: David Rudnick 11
- ganja thread 2.0 527527
- Vid of the Day 1529615296
Inta..Fucked! 2525 Responses
Last post: 1 year, 2 months ago | Thread started: Apr 9, 12, 1:30 p.m.
- insomnie
I'm not saying it's a conspiracy, but it's a conspiracy!
"Last week, Instagram closed a $50 million financing round with several prominent investors, including Sequoia Capital, an early backer of Google; Thrive Capital, the firm run by Joshua Kushner; and Greylock Capital, an early investor of LinkedIn. The round valued the photo service at about $500 million, according to one person with knowledge of the matter, who requested anonymity because the discussions were private. With Facebook's purchase, one week later, that investment has now doubled in value. " - NYT
- Apr 9, 12, 1:30 p.m. – Permalink
- prophetone


- Dog-earApr 9, 12, 1:42 p.m. – Permalink
- monospaced
Facebook bought it for $1 billion

- Dog-earApr 9, 12, 1:57 p.m. – Permalink
- randommail
Yup this is the latest bubble.
There's always a bubble that Wall Street will scam the public to jump into.

- Dog-earApr 9, 12, 2:05 p.m. – Permalink
- monospaced
monNom, it's not "so little" in the sense that it will keep millions of users attached to Facebook with Instagram for years to come. This means more ad exposure and more money. It might not seem worth $1B, but it seems so to FB.


- Dog-earApr 9, 12, 2:13 p.m. – Permalink
- tredesigns
was instagram even profitable.


- Dog-earApr 9, 12, 7:43 p.m. – Permalink
- 2002
This is not about profitability. This is about "buy everything that competition can potentially buy".
And seems very much like Netscape deal in the 90s (any sort of dot com dump deal in the 90s).
Lets use this as a vehicle to make more money for silicon valley insiders. Public will buy this up and we get out while they are holding the bags.


- Dog-earApr 9, 12, 8:55 p.m. – Permalink






