Public Voice Network
- MILF's and curvy chic… 278278
- Flickr Redesign 3333
- religion 211211
- GIF vs JIF 2929
- Daft Cars / Anyone? 55
- TITS GIF 1919
- Pic of the Day 7472174721
- You're at a party and… 5353
- Official NSFW Thread 252252
- Ray Manzarek, RIP : / 1818
- the gif animation thread 1845818458
- Messages by location? 88
- Show some recent work 55555555
- Nexus 10?
- Star Trek Into Darkness 6262
- Notre Dame 88
- Apple Manufacturing 1515
- LA Life 99
- Famous Street Artists 1414
- The Silk Road 1515
- Really? 4343
- sliding top panel wordpre… 11
- Amy's Baking Company 112112
- Xbox: New Generation Reve… 6767
E-Cat (cold fusion sigh..) 2828 Responses
Last post: 1 year, 4 months ago | Thread started: Jan 14, 12, 10:19 a.m.
- georgesIII
I've been following Rossi's works since last year when I saw his filmed experiment in Bologna university,
but I've been deceived many time by others so called scientist who claimed "free energy" but never backed it with anything tangible,now here we are in 2012 and his invention is taking a big step into commercialization, imagine how the world could look like if every houses, transportation, factories could be fitted with an E-cat.
this invention could simply end all wars overnight, I may be over simplifying the situation but imagine not having to go around the world pillaging it for liquid gold.
now lets hope he doesn't shoot himself in the head twice from behind
http://e-catalyzer.it/
http://www.focus.it/andrea-rossi…
http://pesn.com/2011/05/31/95018…here: last year experiment in bologna's university to get you started
- Jan 14, 12, 10:19 a.m. – Permalink
- georgesIII
here's another good link for those like me, first believed it was a huge scam, this could be the real deal (better fuckn be, please don't be a scam)

- Dog-earJan 14, 12, 10:41 a.m. – Permalink
- sine
a primer:
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/arch…some debate:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/201…

- Dog-earJan 16, 12, 5:11 a.m. – Permalink
- animatedgif
"If energy prices go down across the board, theoretically goods will become much cheaper, and people won't need to work in the same way that they do now just to survive."
Doomed from the start, people at the top of the pile would never let this happen.


- Dog-earJan 16, 12, 6:12 a.m. – Permalink
- monospaced
"Doomed from the start," free energy is impossible.


- Dog-earJan 16, 12, 6:33 a.m. – Permalink
- monospaced
I hate this kind of stuff when it comes to these free energy trials:
"The reactor itself, which is loaded with the nickel powder and secret catalysts pressurized with hydrogen, has an estimated volume of 50 cubic centimeters (3.2 cubic inches)."
Why secret? What are you hiding? Why can't you just publish it so people can get on with creating free energy? Oh wait, it's secret. Such bullshit.


- Dog-earJan 16, 12, 6:41 a.m. – Permalink
- GeorgesII
I'm not at home, but I found another great link from another third rate university aka cambridge, watch the video,
I want to believe
-http://sms.cam.ac.uk/media/11502…
In January 2011 Andrea Rossi demonstrated a device that purported to develop 10 kW of power from a nuclear reaction. This video discusses its credibility, the investigations that have been done on the device, and its future prospects. The nuclear power claim can be tested by measuring total energy over a period of time and comparing it with what would be possible from conventional energy sources[1]. Previous claims of this kind, beginning with that of Fleischmann and Pons in 1989 [2], have been generally doubted, but it is argued that this general doubt owes more to the persuasive power of rhetoric than to the actual facts.
In contrast to the ITER thermonuclear project, where practical application is decades away, reactors of the Rossi type are already in production and, according to NASA Chief Scientist Dennis M. Bushnell, may be capable of "completely changing geo-economics, geo-politics, and solving climate and energy"[3].


- Dog-earJan 16, 12, 7:01 a.m. – Permalink
- monospaced
sine: "in theory, creating this energy would be free..."
What theory is that? Problem is, they aren't even sure what exactly is responsible for creating the energy, so it's premature to call it "free." And, if they wanted to really save the world, they wouldn't keep it secret, they'd share it with physicists to test and prove. If it's secret, it won't be free or liberating.


- Dog-earJan 16, 12, 7:32 a.m. – Permalink
- detritus
mono - this is NOT free energy and that video above is from NASA.
http://technologygateway.nasa.go…
Everyone's being massively hesitant around this subject now with good reason, but just as equally, this tech needn't necessarily rely on impossible physics ... just the '99%' of physics we don't understand yet.
Georges - Could you please link me to something that proves we've photographed a black hole and/or could you send me a link to proof of another 'Earth-like planet', as far as I'm aware, we have no evidence for either right now.
Unless, of course, you meant 'event horizon' around Black hole, and/or planets about Earth's size... but by that metric, so is Venus, and we've known about her for a good few years now.


- Dog-earJan 16, 12, 7:50 a.m. – Permalink




