Public Voice Network
- Vid of the Day 1507115071
- Bitcoin 122122
- Been asked to do a legal … 1313
- Pic of the Day 7476674766
- MILF's and curvy chic… 279279
- this style of photography… 22
- The Purge 1717
- ganja thread 2.0 515515
- Outdoorsmanship 4848
- I ❤ Wood 333333
- lunch = 977977
- WANT of the day 14081408
- Show your latest Pics 39373937
- London machete attack 4747
- iPhoto 77
- San Francisco 3030
- International Web Dev 33
- Best Free VST plugins... 33
- Art of the Day Thread 323323
- Game of Thrones 299299
- Phone 33
- movies on YouTube 117117
- Made a memorial page for … 2424
- Pirate Bay 3232
Crowdsourcing from the 'client' viewpoint 3030 Responses
Last post: 2 years, 3 months ago | Thread started: Feb 4, 11, 9:54 a.m.
- MSTRPLN
"I wouldn’t skimp in this area as there is a clear correlation between the amount of the award and the quality and number of designs you will receive. You can also rest easy knowing that most crowdsourcing sites have a 100% money back guarantee if you don’t like the results."
WOW!


- Dog-earFeb 4, 11, 11:37 a.m. – Permalink
- brandelec
"When you think about what you get from a crowdsourcing contest, you realize how powerful this new trend really is. For a minimal amount you are able to tap the creative abilities and talents of a multitude of people across the world. Why pay one designer 10 times more for a product you may not like? You may also end up materially affecting someone’s life – some of our design submissions came from developing nations where $2,500 means a great deal. The one big drawback is that it is a time-consuming endeavor, and to manage a good contest takes a decent amount of planning and focus. Trust us though, it’s worth it."


- Dog-earFeb 4, 11, 11:42 a.m. – Permalink
- polyestercorp
It's the "100% money back guarantee if you don’t like the results." that I think is the biggest issue. It creates a belief in clients that not using what was created means not having to pay for it even when working with more established designers. I've only had one client (years ago) not pay and they used that line based on their experience from crowd sourcing.


- Dog-earFeb 4, 11, 12:47 p.m. – Permalink
- pr2
We used crowsourcing job looking for illustrators, we had a few dozens beautifly sketched background that we needed to turn into full color images... The pay was decent (you would get paid per image) so we had high hopes... Until we started getting spamed by an avalanche of untalented hacks. I mean it was so bad we had to find someone local... Trust me you don't want to see what some of those "illustrators" from India are capable of.
The experience taught us at:
a.) talent costs money
b.) even if you pay decent wages - people in the creative fields are awfully lazy
c.) you need clear communication and strict supervisions (i would never attempt anything bigger then a logo - maybe - without ability to see the people in person)

- Dog-earFeb 4, 11, 2:33 p.m. – Permalink
- comicsans
The trouble is that everyone is looking for a good deal and many imagine that anything which can be bought is a commodity. Ask them if they would choose a medical specialist on that basis and many would say "yes", consider how laser eye surgery is peddled for instance.


- Dog-earFeb 5, 11, 6:43 a.m. – Permalink



