Vintage Stock Site? 66 Responses

Last post: 2 years, 3 months ago | Thread started: Oct 29, 09, 2:03 p.m.

RespondNew TopicDisable Images

• Greedo

  I'm looking for 50/60s type stock photography of insanely happy people doing stuff, having a hard time finding any good sites for that...
  I tried Veer, no joy there, and googling got me nowhere; anyone got any suggestions? Color preferred, but b/w will do just fine...
  Something along these lines:
  

  

  Oct 29, 09, 2:03 p.m. – Permalink

• dirtydesign

  csaimages.com

  • <<<– monospaced

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earOct 29, 09, 2:03 p.m. – Permalink

• Greedo

  Maybe i'm stupid, but i don't see a single photo of a real person in that CSAimages site. Lovely stuff, but i need people...

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earOct 29, 09, 2:10 p.m. – Permalink

• MrT

  Not massive libraries but some good images.

  http://tackorama.net/
  http://www.retroviews.com/

  You may have more joy Googling 'retro' rather than 'vintage' ...

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earOct 29, 09, 2:33 p.m. – Permalink

• dirtydesign

  sounds like you need an illustrator.

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earOct 29, 09, 2:37 p.m. – Permalink

• duckofrubber

  http://www.gettyimages.com/Creat…
  http://www.superstock.com/Vintag…
  http://www.retrostockpix.com
  http://www.timetunnel.com

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earOct 29, 09, 2:38 p.m. – Permalink

• dirtydesign

  this dude is the man at vintage illustration.

  http://www.taviscoburn.com/portf…

  • def the man. but wtf is that motion graphics part of the site about. worst ever– erikjonsson

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earOct 29, 09, 2:41 p.m. – Permalink