Public Voice Network
- Shit QBNers Say 5555
- Shit QBNers think 77
- Pic of the Day 5936759367
- Vid of the Day 1095710957
- Shit Photographers Say 44
- intern -> job 1818
- TYPO San Francisco 33
- Park Slope 11
- What are you listening to… 41674167
- AE shadows won't work 88
- Trailer Of The Day 388388
- Skillz of the day 2121
- Politics 1759417594
- Smart Phone #2 88
- Your Last Concert 369369
- Show some recent work 47664766
- QBN+ Challenge 26 4343
- Chick of the Day 1431314313
- the gif animation thread 1132111321
- DUBSTEP of the Day 369369
- Show your latest Pics 29702970
- Skateboarding. 596596
- blog 5557755577
- ♥ Things girls like ♥ 9595
Nice charity sites 1111 Responses
Last post: 2 years, 7 months ago | Thread started: Jun 19, 09, 8:13 p.m.
- jamble
Anyone got any links to nicely designed and highly accessible charity websites? I've had a look on the filter and there's not much that's very inspiring and the majority of sites that adhere to the top accessibility standards look shit.
I'm sure there are sites out there that meet the standards and actually look good as well but I can't find much!
- Jun 19, 09, 8:13 p.m. – Permalink
- 23kon
AAA Accessibility shouldnt restrict your design whatsoever in terms of what can and cant be done as theres workarounds for everything which gives normal users a great experience and look and people needing an accessible website will get exactly that.
It's only your colour palette that will be restricted or not exactly as you'd ideally like it because you'll need to make sure that theres enough contrast between colours of text n backgrounds etc.
Its rediculous some of the sites or brochures that some companies are knocking out that are meant to adhere to full accessibility and are nowhere near it or that its not even been considered.


- Dog-earJun 20, 09, 9:03 a.m. – Permalink
- lukus_W
Using best-practice (in terms of site development / design), goes a long way to achieving accessibility aims. I think that people who need high visibility are more dependant on sites which have corrected marked up code. If your site can be navigated without a stylesheet, and you use headings sensibly, this is going to make a hell of a difference - because the user will be able to apply their own high-vis stylesheets to your markup.
I know that people who use screenreaders are very dependent on correct use of headers - because this allows them to tab through content quickly to find what they're interested in.
You can always allow the user to toggle text-size and provide your own toggle for a high-visiblity stylesheet if you're keen to provide an aethetically pleasing version of your site for all users.
Personally, I really like to be able to find a community of users (who need accessible sites) who are willing to demo / test sites and give feedback based on their experiences. There must be communities out their who do this, but I'm yet to find any; though, chances are, I haven't been looking hard enough.


- Dog-earJun 20, 09, 9:15 a.m. – Permalink
- jamble
I'm quite open to other (or indeed any) suggestions of decent sites adhering to top standards.
I've got a pretty good idea of how to build it, I just wanted to see some examples of how charities in particular approach the whole look and feel and a big part of it is to drive donations through the site as I'm redesigning a site soon for a deaf and blind society so the need for uber accessibility is there but it also needs to have a clear function in terms of driving donations.
Just wanted to know if anyone had any nice links as pretty much all the charity sites I've seen so far look like fucking awful.


- Dog-earJun 20, 09, 11:29 a.m. – Permalink
- lukus_W
how about http://www.shelter.org.uk/

- Dog-earJun 20, 09, 11:38 a.m. – Permalink
- NEWSFLASH
not sure if this is what you want, but its..rice..get it ??!
http://www.freerice.com/
- Dog-earJun 20, 09, 12:02 p.m. – Permalink
- akrokdesign


- Dog-earJun 20, 09, 1:59 p.m. – Permalink
- akrokdesign
http://www.nature.org/
http://www.defenders.org/ - good cause, bad site. :-)

- Dog-earJun 20, 09, 2:04 p.m. – Permalink
- akrokdesign


- Dog-earJun 20, 09, 2:05 p.m. – Permalink
- bkpatterson


- Dog-earJun 21, 09, 1:59 a.m. – Permalink


