SAy No To DIGital! 2727 Responses

Last post: 3 years ago | Thread started: May 11, 09, 9:54 a.m.

RespondNew TopicDisable Images

• jimbojones

  what the dopepope said. the difference is that usually people who still bother to work with film actually know shit about photography

  • not necessarily– Meeklo

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earMay 11, 09, 10:11 a.m. – Permalink

• benfal99

  all those pics could have been made digital.
  your argument is invalid.

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earMay 11, 09, 10:11 a.m. – Permalink

• benfal99

  talent does not equal the amount of knowledge

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earMay 11, 09, 10:12 a.m. – Permalink

• rson

  @ jimbojones I feel like the film I see today proves that people know shit about photography. The images here http://iconology.therndm.com/arc… are actually really poor in quality.

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earMay 11, 09, 10:18 a.m. – Permalink

• kaonashi

  dopepope proves once again what an enormous hack he is.

  Go back to deviantart.

  • hahahahaha. K.– dopepope1/4

    wow dude, uncalled for.– morilla2/4

    http://www.qbn.com/t…– version33/4

    LOL.– peezum4/4

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earMay 11, 09, 10:18 a.m. – Permalink

• Mal

  Say no to Chap-jeans!
  

  

  • what tribe are they from?– uberdesigner1/5

    Aquanet tribe– Mal2/5

    you know they put all kind of thought into those outfits.– sea_sea3/5

    i'm pretty sure they're canadian. they all look like that.– lambsy4/5

    I'm wearing that shirt right now.– monNom5/5

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earMay 11, 09, 10:18 a.m. – Permalink

• Tungsten

  I like chappies better on film...

  

  • hey, that really looks better– jimbojones

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earMay 11, 09, 10:27 a.m. – Permalink

• jimbojones

  now that I've seen the pics there, the only special thing about them is that they were shot on film. that is all.

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earMay 11, 09, 10:27 a.m. – Permalink

• harlequino

  Wouldn't real film purists not be online at all?

  • +1– rson

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earMay 11, 09, 10:27 a.m. – Permalink

• dopepope

  Kaonashi, how does my comment prove I'm a hack, (which I clearly am). That seemed a bit uncalled for. A downgraded digital version of an image taken with film on a website will not exhibit how much better it is than digital film. Why did you take that personally enough to insult me?

  • http://www.qbn.com/t…– version31/3

    right.– dopepope2/3

    His work probably sucks just as bad as yours. LOL.– peezum3/3

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earMay 11, 09, 2:09 p.m. – Permalink

• DrBombay

  

  • :)– sublocked

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earMay 11, 09, 2:20 p.m. – Permalink

• Meeklo

  

  Only insecure people put their tool as an excuse to gain validation from others.

  Let the actual work speak for itself, forget about film, digital, mac, pc, pen or pencil. In the end all it matters is the results.

  • +++– janne76

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earMay 11, 09, 2:21 p.m. – Permalink

• Meeklo

  "this makes total sense. Lets find digital versions of film images and post them even smaller in digital form on a website to prove they're better than digital!"

  dopepope

  • that was fantastic– Meeklo

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earMay 11, 09, 3:24 p.m. – Permalink

• forcetwelve

  they look nice, but digi still has its place, i dont care what you say.

  • yeah, in the world of productivity– version3

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earMay 11, 09, 3:31 p.m. – Permalink

• Meeklo

  One time on a shoot, the photographer I usually with, brought an assistant, one one of the breaks she started telling me how much better film is over digital, as if she was trying to convince me, her work was so much better than the actual photographer.

  My first thought is, she was the female version of the 55 year old guy wearing pony tail and hawaiian shirt, that thinks his work doesn't stink because he does it on a mac.

  trust me, these days, a statement like that is best to keep it to yourself, or at least wait till someone actually told you they like your work before saying it, chances are your are going to be put on the same bag as the guy that just now got a point and shoot and loves telling people to stand sideways with their hands on their waist before taking a photo.

  • spot on– morilla

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earMay 11, 09, 3:39 p.m. – Permalink

• sikma

  If you could go back and give all the old b+w masters the choice between their clunky/fickle film cameras and a Canon Mark II I doubt their would hesitate a second in switching over. Film is nothing more than a means to an end, not a standard or a benchmark to measure everything else against.

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earMay 11, 09, 6:03 p.m. – Permalink