Schiphol right now
- Started
- Last post
- 77 Responses
- janne760
styleplus,
congratulations. you are a complete and utter idiot.- janne no need to be a dick,
4 crashed plane in a month, thats statically impossible, like winning the lottery 4 time in a rowGeorgesII - you got stats, then?janne76
- 'statistically impossible', is like the ultimate form of admission of not understanding how statistics work.Nairn
- Nice one Nairn.Orbit
- *clapsjanne76
- janne no need to be a dick,
- janne760
hi, welcome to page 4.
i still don't believe..
- janne760
sorry, but all this tinfoil-hat-esque reasoning somehow makes me a dick.
- Orbit0
For fuck's sake you conspiracy nuts see magic air everywhere you look. More planes are crashing because we're pushing planes pilots and fuel quotas to the breach in an ongoing race to be ever more profitable.
Its like the parable of the man with the mule ... he discovers the mule pulls his plough just as effectively on half the amount of food. Great, he thinks, so he saves cash on mule food and still gets all the work done.
A few weeks later he tries again and lo and behold halving for a second time doesn't seem to affect the mule... and so on and so on until the mule drops down dead, or... until the planes start falling out of the sky.
Or maybe you're right... its 10billion year old hebrew lizards who are merely using us to make the earth fertile for their martian crops.
- GeorgesII0
yeah the autopilot plane is kinda far fetched but,
here are some stats
http://www.fearlessflight.com/fl…
-
Your chances of being involved in an aircraft accident are about 1 in 11 million. On the other hand, your chances of being killed in an automobile accident are 1 in 5000. Statistically, you are at far greater risk driving to the airport than getting on an airplane. However, the perception is that you have more control over your fate when you are in your car than as a passenger traveling on an airplane. Experience shows otherwise, considering that over 50,000 people are killed on the highways every year.
-
- neverblink0
for janne:
- dconstrukt0
shit and i wanted to go to amsterdam....
- no need to go there.. goole has streetview now: http://www.qbn.com/t…neverblink
- styleplus0
@janne76
It's a simple matter of belief. You can choose to believe whatever you want, even in the face of facts.I'll post the link again:
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bi…Ever heard of technology?
for the dumbasses: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tec…No, no. You just wanna believe technology only exists when in relation to fancy movie sets, gidgets, trinkets, bobbles, etc.
you can choose to ignore what you want. THAT'S ALL.
- Orbit0
Ah, the whole mishmash is brought to a neat little conclusion by styleplus himself...
"You can choose to believe whatever you want, even in the face of facts"
Good man Styleplus. I knew you weren't as daft as you were making out.
- digdre0
time for a new page
- digdre0
Welcome
- GeorgesII0
fist
- styleplus0
@Orbit. Thanks.
How about reading the article. That was my point.
...and read another related one, if you so wish:
http://74.125.47.132/search?q=ca…(I know the ignorant feel threatened by what they're not immediately familiar with)
- ignorant ehheheGeorgesII
- No I read it. It confirmed for me the total state of delusion you are under. It says nothing relevant.Orbit
- Don't see the relevance?
You're either kidding or a DUMBASS.styleplus - In either case, I expect your inquisitiveness to wane at this point. Let's see if it does...styleplus
- noones reading it styleplus. give up man.janne76
- oh no? janne76?
you're obviously reading. SEVERAL DAYS LATER...
Who do you think you're kidding?styleplus - ...Who do you think you're kidding, Janne76?
You amuse me, sometimes.styleplus
- Orbit0
Okay so what's your full take on it then Styleplus. Tell us the full story.. why the plane crashes... I'm willing to suspend my disbelief. Align me with your perceptions, I am a seeker of truth.
- Orbit0
Is your answer quite long by any chance?
I'm just asking... not a criticism, its just I'm going to head off fairly soon.
- styleplus0
If I had a full take
...I would be the 'conspiracy nut' that all of you seem to fear so much.
I woke up this morning just like you did (I'm assuming).I just happen to have heard of Raytheon. I accept that Raytheon exists (I don't deny it).
http://www.raytheon.com/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray…and I just happen to have heard of public programs (not secretive) that involve the installation of technology directed at remote-controlling commercial aircraft (with the stated intention of safely landing potentially compromised aircraft):
http://74.125.47.132/search?q=ca…http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bi…
you probably want me to give a 'full sensationalised story' of 'how it all happened'
again: if I did that, I'd be a full of shit, myself.At the end of the day, the FACTS stand.