Public Voice Network
- GIF vs JIF 1717
- Notre Dame 33
- TITS GIF 1515
- The Silk Road 1515
- Really? 4343
- Apple Manufacturing 1313
- sliding top panel wordpre… 11
- You're at a party and… 3838
- Pic of the Day 7471674716
- Famous Street Artists 1313
- the gif animation thread 1845618456
- Amy's Baking Company 112112
- Xbox: New Generation Reve… 6767
- Stag Do - London 44
- MILF's and curvy chic… 276276
- Tornado season 112112
- Vid of the Day 1505315053
- What are you listening to… 55795579
- LA Life 88
- Star Trek Into Darkness 5858
- iPhone Apps of the Day 9292
- Anywhere in the USA 55
- I ❤ Wood 330330
- CNN Fail of the Day 2727
Should we develop this logo? 4141 Responses
Last post: 4 years, 7 months ago | Thread started: Sep 29, 08, 8:50 a.m.
- kushman
We're a small web design outfit trying to get bigger and better contracts yadda, yadda...
Anyway this was our old logo:

And we recently moved to the one our site at the moment, this one:

But my friend at the desk opposite came up with this one:

So the question is should we scrap our current logo and develop the crown logo further?
We're not sure if it's too clever for it's own good for the type of clients we generally have?
Any thoughts?
- Sep 29, 08, 8:50 a.m. – Permalink
- Jnr_Madison
Don't like the one your friend did.


- Dog-earSep 29, 08, 8:52 a.m. – Permalink
- Jnr_Madison
I think your current one is too generic.


- Dog-earSep 29, 08, 8:55 a.m. – Permalink
- dusty_shackle
I would take the old logo and just kick it up a notch. Change the font and play with the green glowy thing a bit. The crown sucks and the IE one looks like a rejected adobe icon.


- Dog-earSep 29, 08, 8:57 a.m. – Permalink
- kingsteven
(∆∆∆) is my logo, but for slightly more obvious reasons.


- Dog-earSep 29, 08, 8:57 a.m. – Permalink
- max_prophet
Your current one is at least generic and somewhat confident.
The crown version is a cheap gimmick with a cheaper Burger King 'idea' running behind it, with the addition of an overly wordy and clumsy tagline. Now maybe you need a tagline I don't know, but this isn't the tagline you need.


- Dog-earSep 29, 08, 9:30 a.m. – Permalink
- max_prophet
Internet Essentials

- Dog-earSep 29, 08, 9:32 a.m. – Permalink
- PromotionalUseOnly
get rid of the grey part bit of the ring on the I, and possibly look at doing a flat-on version too to go with it


- Dog-earSep 29, 08, 9:33 a.m. – Permalink
- neue75_bold
the kerning on the new one is better though... you need to have someone tweak the current one...


- Dog-earSep 29, 08, 9:35 a.m. – Permalink
- Jnr_Madison
Microsoft called, they said you can keep the IE mark with the new type.


- Dog-earSep 29, 08, 9:38 a.m. – Permalink
- ian
The old one looks like a logo for anal sex (with either a muppet or some kind of gangrenous hole) the second one looks the the new adobe icons and the last one looks like an icon from istock.
You're going to struggle with the name which is fantastically generic, so either develop the second one into a nice logotype, or come at it with a fresh head ans some completely new ideas. No crowns, you're not the internet kings (or maybe you are) as its just as generic as the name.
Sorry if this is overly harsh but those are my two cents.


- Dog-earSep 29, 08, 9:42 a.m. – Permalink
- kushman
Wow thanks for ripping our work apart guys, I feel much better now.
It's definitely back to the drawing board with this one.For me, I agree with SkyPoo (thanks for that)
'think your current logo attempts to say nothing at all and succeeds, and the second one one attempts to speak volumes and fails.'
Personally I don't like the old one either. Type looks dated and the green dot looks very 90s software house.
I don't like the name but we're stuck with it. (My boss is worried that if we change it customers may think we've gone bust!)
And yes, the tag-line wanks on too.
I'm really struggling with that name...

- Dog-earSep 29, 08, 12:25 p.m. – Permalink




