Public Voice Network
- New Ideo Site
- Quick Survey for Philosop… 3030
- Dexter, Season III 4949
- Favorite brands 2222
- Aquarium owners
- blog 3121731217
- Pic of the Day 1049710497
- God is quite busy 7272
- question for photographer…
- Cuts Like a Knife
- best restaurant websites 2626
- Politics 50625062
- FMT 120508 2828
- Super Bowl Logo (Vector)
- Is Suresh turning into a … 2828
- this is for... you!
- design works vs. carl dek… 99
- touch screen 11
- Medium Format 307307
- Need a what.cd invite 4040
- Got a blind date tonight… 2727
- Canadian Politics con'… 5555
- Slideshow CSS/Java 55
- EC: Shoe at Rush Hour 77
sifr or flir? 55 Responses
Last post: 2 months, 2 weeks ago | Thread started: Sep 18, 08, 5:46 p.m.
- joelski
does anyone have experience using http://facelift.mawhorter.net/
I am not sure what I should use sifr or flir?
obviously the advantages of using flir is image replacement rather then flash...but is it buggy on different browsers?
- Sep 18, 08, 5:46 p.m. – Permalink
- acescence
never used it, but it looks interesting. the two major differences i see are that this puts the processing on your server vs sifr, which happens on the client side. not sure what sort of issue this is, or what kind of cpu drag this creates. i know generating image stuff can be pretty taxing on the server if load is heavy. also, with sifr, the text is still selectable and you can copy/paste, this is just an image so that's not possible.


- Dog-earSep 18, 08, 8:15 p.m. – Permalink
- monNom
sIFR3 is quite nice to work with (compared to sIFR2)
http://novemberborn.net/recentbut can be funny across browsers and maybe a bit slow for lots of instances. I found it crashed safari when paired with mooTools.
another option is FIR (I think that's it) where you set the
background of a text element as image text, then overflow: hidden;
height and padding-top: equal to image height.
foolproof full layout control and no javascript to break. no selection though.
- Dog-earSep 18, 08, 9:17 p.m. – Permalink

