Public Voice Network
- How much % of visitors to… 2727
- Friday, fuck yeah 11
- my identity is loading... 44
- Folio Crit 239239
- that jquery, 3838
- Volume One 88
- NT Blackbook Vol.1 1414
- Google - Promote & Re… 77
- logo crit 4545
- Wanda Sykes munches rug 1212
- Baby P's Parents/Kill… 5555
- Vid of the Day 492492
- Your Christmas List 2424
- Secret Santa Gift Ideas 1313
- Looking for Flash tutoria… 44
- Arrested Development Movi… 3232
- New XBox Live 4646
- Pic of the Day 1017410174
- EC: Quarter Pounder 77
- blog 3025230252
- Jaline 103103
- Chick of the Day 16001600
- Portfolio online 1616
- Free Style 2424
70,000 samples 33 seconds 1515 Responses
Last post: 2 months, 3 weeks ago | Thread started: Aug 27, 08, 7:39 p.m.
- molo
One of them crazy Germans went out of his way to make a 'song' with 70,200 samples and registered every single one of them with GEMA (the German song writers assocition/RIAA thing)
/\ the piece 'Product Placements'
/\ a little video with his entertaining conversation with some GEMA employee...he needed 70,000 forms.- Aug 27, 08, 7:39 p.m. – Permalink
- mikotondria3
mm...ok,
so if length of sample is not an issue with regard to the law, then every single recording since 1952 is a violation because it uses silence, a clear usage of John Cages Four Minutes and Thirty Three seconds...
Or a track I made in 1994, where the sample values go from 5029 to 5021 to 5007, normally this would last 3*(1/44000)ths of a second, but it is my work and I demand compensation once by bots have scoured the music of the internet and return details of the works that contain it.

- Dog-earAug 27, 08, 7:49 p.m. – Permalink
- mikotondria3
He did make a point, more importantly he created some hype and interest around the apparantly new fusion of 2 old ideas, namely musique concrete and music litigation. I found it quite a novel little artistic endevor, cause it presents the problems and inadequacies of the current system in 33 seconds of sound, and if anything it will fuel or seed more discussion and progress. Not that it should, or that that was the point, but his work is a great sideways ultra-condensed view of the massive global problem.
Ausgezeichnet, dass Mann.
- Dog-earAug 27, 08, 8:10 p.m. – Permalink
- Knuckleberry
Anybody else want to make out with the lawyer, by make out I mean F her.


- Dog-earAug 27, 08, 8:42 p.m. – Permalink
- blankeyecue
Now now this is NU MUSIC!!!


- Dog-earAug 27, 08, 11:04 p.m. – Permalink
- akrokdesign
fap fap fap ....whats that? german TECHNO. lol.


- Dog-earAug 27, 08, 11:06 p.m. – Permalink
- lowimpakt
not nearly as classy as what Autechre did when the Criminal Justice Bill was threatening rave back in the 1990's. The Bill specifically targetted raves and free parties 'wholly or predominantly characterised by the emission of a succession of repetitive beats' so they released 'flutter'...
"Warning: Lost and Djarum contain repetitive beats. We advise you not to play these tracks if the Criminal Justice Bill becomes law. Flutter has been programmed in such a way that no bars contain identical beats and can therefore be played at 45 or 33 revolutions under the proposed law. However we advise DJs to have a lawyer and musicologist present at all times to confirm the non-repetitive nature of the music in the event of police harrassment."


- Dog-earAug 28, 08, 12:48 a.m. – Permalink
- molo
^ yep subblocked, great site same with createdigitalmotion
http://createdigitalmusic.com/
http://createdigitalmotion.com/

- Dog-earAug 28, 08, 8:21 a.m. – Permalink
- ninjasavant
congratulations, you have created radio static.

- Dog-earAug 28, 08, 8:23 a.m. – Permalink

