Public Voice Network
- Furniture Websites 2828
- QBN Tips and tricks 3434
- QBN Late Nighters 321321
- Writer Website 44
- CMS? 2121
- RIP Greg Sher 1111
- Font critic II 5050
- Gaza 286286
- David Lee Roth 33
- _random movie stills 13381338
- TinEye 1010
- :: Ponce, PR :: To Do Lis… 99
- graphics card NOOB 11
- wtf 1212
- Pic of the Day 1113711137
- sympathy for the design i… 77
- blog 3467334673
- Over 20 skateboarders 3333
- ffffound invite swapshop 589589
- css for specific page 33
- Comic Books ... 898898
- Official 2008-09 NHL Thre… 132132
- EC: I'm selling colors. 2828
- Nip/Tuck 3636
Band photos 3838 Responses
Last post: 4 months ago | Thread started: Aug 27, 08, 10:35 a.m.
- mikotondria3
Band photos are all crap.
There's always the 'craaaazy' one, usually the lead singer, pulling a face or looking really mean and into it, whilst the others stand there looking awkward like it's a bloody family portrait or nervously half-interacting with the antics of the 'crazy one'.
eg
Defy or confirm this with examples.- Aug 27, 08, 10:35 a.m. – Permalink
- mikotondria3
I just saw this about 2 minutes ago in your "I just saw..." thread


- Dog-earAug 27, 08, 10:36 a.m. – Permalink
- ninjasavant


- Dog-earAug 27, 08, 10:37 a.m. – Permalink
- Jaline
Photography sites:
http://www.angelaboatwright.com/…
http://www.timothysaccenti.com/
http://wendylynchphotography.com…
http://www.alanclarke.co.uk/musi…

- Dog-earAug 27, 08, 10:40 a.m. – Permalink
- mikotondria3
All band photos are utterly contemptible cliches.
Hey look its us, having our picure taken in/under/on/next to something that somehow highlights our shamanically different view of the world and the blinding light of talent that we bring into your life whilst still looking like people you worked with at that crap job.

- Dog-earAug 27, 08, 10:48 a.m. – Permalink
- mikotondria3
That's because they're just adrift in this cultural waste land, making their own, new way, with one foot in the decay of the past, building the bright brave new world of tomorrow, today.
The cunts.

- Dog-earAug 27, 08, 10:50 a.m. – Permalink
- mg33
Interesting topic. My band has been going on and on for months trying to decide on a photo concept. Something cool without too much expense.
But here's where most bands fail, and the photo that dog_opus posted is a great example. Photos like that, when they appear in a publication, newspaper article, or show listing, simply CANNOT BE SEEN. The members are too spread out, you can't see their faces, and when positioned in an even smaller context the whole point is lost.
I've really been paying attention to the photos that I've seen in local papers. So much FAIL.

- Dog-earAug 27, 08, 10:51 a.m. – Permalink
- mikotondria3
Then don't have a picture, why should you ?
You don't need a 'photo concept', you're not photoconcepters, you're musicians, if anyone asks for a photo tell them to fuck off.
".....but what Im asking is - if you HAD to dance about architecture, how would that go ?"

- Dog-earAug 27, 08, 10:54 a.m. – Permalink
- mg33
It's just that bands at a small level never put thought into where the photo appears.
Here's a good, "bad" example, from a local show promotion site:
http://www.mpshows.com/admin/ima…
http://www.mpshows.com/admin/ima…
http://www.mpshows.com/admin/ima…
http://www.mpshows.com/admin/ima…
This is a PERFECT example.

- Dog-earAug 27, 08, 10:55 a.m. – Permalink
- flashbender


- Dog-earAug 27, 08, 11:05 a.m. – Permalink










