Skip to main content

horrible Animal Planet logo 2727 Responses

Last post: 5 months, 4 weeks ago | Thread started: Feb 28, 08, 8:33 p.m.

RespondNew TopicDisable Images

  • Point5

    can anyone explain why they changed there logo to have this ridiculous sideways M?
    http://animal.discovery.com

    This has been bugging me for the last 2 weeks and I demand answers now.

    Feb 28, 08, 8:33 p.m. – Permalink
  • rtr

    i heard that the CEO of AZIMAL PLANET let his son rebrand it with his Webelos group

    • Webelos are usually excellent designers.AndyRoss1/2
      yeah i wonder what happened this time. those Webelos have put out some good work in the pastrtr2/2
    next note >+ add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earFeb 28, 08, 8:37 p.m. – Permalink
  • b_magallanes

    I think its supposed to represent tiger stripes.

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earFeb 28, 08, 9:58 p.m. – Permalink
  • Ampersanderson

    "The new programming on Animal Planet will tap into the instincts that drive us all — fear, hunger, pleasure, nurture — with compelling stories that resonate with what it means to be human."

    + add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earFeb 28, 08, 10:25 p.m. – Permalink
  • sea_sea

    yup, some kind of stripes.

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earFeb 28, 08, 11:06 p.m. – Permalink
  • Drno

    MAKE THE LOGO BIGGER GODDAMIT

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earFeb 28, 08, 11:10 p.m. – Permalink
  • Point5

    thanks Ampersanderson. I knew there had to be something out there that reviewed this.

    "Regardless of what typeface it is or isn't, the logo is a weird jumble of ideas. I am guessing that the varying widths of each letter represent the different animals, that the sideways M could be an animal in a different position (I would gander sleeping or ready to fornicate), or maybe it's a bat, and that the overall composition is meant to feel alive and unexpected. Unfortunately it feels mechanical, constricted and, well, dead. For an identity that strives to "bring out the raw, visceral emotion in the animal kingdom" this simply does not cut it."

    glad I'm not the only one that is disturbed by this thing. I usually don't rant about things like this, but Animal Planet is a channel I watch on occasion and this logo actually deters me from watching it anymore. It irks me to no end.

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earFeb 28, 08, 11:13 p.m. – Permalink
  • uncle_helv

    They are both shit...

    http://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/animal_planet_logo.gif

    Point5 what the fuck are you on about??

    • I never said I liked the before logo either. This new one with the varying widths an "M-thing" just drives me mad.Point51/2
      Animal crackers typeface, they both blow...utopian2/2
    next note >+ add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earFeb 28, 08, 11:17 p.m. – Permalink
  • utopian

    It looks like a "zoo exhibit" logo, bad design. I'm surprised they did not throw-in an Apple stylized reflection, drop shadow or a web 2.0 3D gel like typeface...

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earFeb 28, 08, 11:18 p.m. – Permalink
  • rtr

    all i think of when i see it is "I better turn AZN off"

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earFeb 28, 08, 11:32 p.m. – Permalink
  • ukit

    My god, that's the worst logo for a big company I've ever seen, hands down.

    I'm just in awe of how bad it is.

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earFeb 28, 08, 11:52 p.m. – Permalink
  • brains

    holy jesus. fouty's return!

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earFeb 28, 08, 11:56 p.m. – Permalink
  • ukit

    Victoria Lowell, Senior Vice President of Marketing

    "Animal Planet has commissioned a new logo to signal its change: the name of the channel in different size letters, made to look as if it could have been created by an animal, Lowell explained. On TV, the logo will come alive with an animal emerging from the "M." Animal Planet is working with London-based design agency Dunning, Eley and Jones on the new logo and look; and Minneapolis-based creative agency Mono on the marketing campaign."

    • hm.
      gross.
      brains1/2
      what?
      "created by an animal!"
      contia12/2
    next note >+ add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earFeb 28, 08, 11:58 p.m. – Permalink
  • utopian

    Must be... the same designer of this hacked London logo below, what happen to UK design? Did crack invade London?

    http://phil.electricweekend.com/wp-content/images/olympicslondon.png

    • fuck me, that happened a long time ago...Raniator
    + add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earFeb 29, 08, 12:07 a.m. – Permalink
  • monNom

    anibal planet?

    that N is NASTY!

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earFeb 29, 08, 12:12 a.m. – Permalink
  • utopian

    http://www.storeappeal.com/images/ugly_doll_mini_wedgehead.jpg

    • "That logo is actually uglier than me" But then again, I only have one eye....utopian
    + add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earFeb 29, 08, 12:15 a.m. – Permalink
  • subimage

    wow that logo fucking sucks.

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earFeb 29, 08, 1:31 a.m. – Permalink
  • rafalski

    ekhmm.. I like it. Well, it's nothing great, but will stick better than the old one. By 2012 this will be the leading style, so be prepared ;)

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earFeb 29, 08, 3:18 a.m. – Permalink
  • babaganush

    I think this and the thread about 'creatives' and suicide go hand in hand. Probably had ALL the life/style sucked out of it by 'VP's' who think the audience are amoebas...can't imagine any company worth their salt actually recommending it...marketeers know best:

    "the name of the channel in different size letters, made to look as if it could have been created by an animal"

    Fucking priceless!...haha

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earFeb 29, 08, 3:38 a.m. – Permalink
  • doesnotexist

    it looks better in the subway ads here in the city. I don't like it in the green color, don't mind the M either. I actually kind of liked the mark when I first saw they had redone it.

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earFeb 29, 08, 6:16 a.m. – Permalink
  • 5timuli

    "as it attempts to shed its family-friendly image for a more intense experience"

    What the fuck is going on with these TV fucktards? They feel they have to pander to the lowest common denominator... they did the same 'rebrand' with Court TV (now Tru TV), ruining the channel in the process.

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earFeb 29, 08, 6:21 a.m. – Permalink

Login or Register to respond to this

Skip to main content