New Law - Game Changer for QBN?
New Law - Game Changer for QBN?
Out of context: Reply #4
- Started
- Last post
- 8 Responses
- shapesalad3
The less porn on the internet the better. Porn is like sugar. Too artificial and highly concentrated, unnatural and thusly pretty much a drug - or at least the highly addictive catalyst for your brain to release dopamine.
It used to be ok when it was just a pinup type photo from the 1940's. But these days it's heading towards dolls and VR. Too Intense...
Just try not to look at porn for a week, a month, 3 months etc. see how long you can go.
Addicted to it right?
- Good thing is people are becoming aware of it, hence the growth in the noFlap movement.shapesalad
- ^ You've been doing it all wrong if you've been flapping it.Maaku
- Holy fuck are you not the biggest modern day Victorian pride on the planet or what? Internet wouldn’t exist without porn.monospaced
- *prudemonospaced
- Shape is correct. I'm not for censorship though, to each his own. I'm still fighting porn addiction, not sure if I can ever master it.M01XXX
- I agree with shape, as well. the avalanche of porn available to young'uns is not a healthy thing.Gnash
- as an adult you should be able to access whatever you like as long as it's mutually consensual.Gnash
- the porn is too intense!!!kingsteven
- lol @ avalanche of pornfuturefood
- Agree porn is detrimental. Disagree that people need their own poor impulses regulated.cannonball1978
- ^ yeah. This is getting to intrusive into people's personal lives. Especially these untrustworthy legal reprosenitviesmugwart
- Snowflake is back.severian
- grossdocpoz
- I'm with Mono; anyone who prescribes to others how they manage their sexuality has got an additional behavioral problem.BustySaintClaire
- Erotica is essential to life, bad porn is not, but the point is that everyone is built & wired different. Chacun son goût ... de gustibus non est disputandum.BustySaintClaire
- Your logic is flawed. Banning things doesn't make them go away, it usually makes them more dangerous. You're not curbing demand, and you are not doing anythingzarkonite
- to counter the means of production. You're just going to see more shady porn production and more exploitation as a result of this ban.zarkonite
- "i don't like it, so no one should." got it.imbecile
- What? You talking about sex trafficking or porn? Sounds like you're imposing your guilt on to others.pango
- ...and if you're just releasing dopamine, you're doing it wrong.bulletfactory
- well, if you wanted to watch 8hours+ of gangbangs etc back in the 1940's you'd have a hard time finding it. the point is, today there's too much.shapesalad
- not saying ban it, just say there's too much, too accessible. I'd hate to be a teenage boy today, I'd be psychologically scared by the stuff out there...shapesalad
- Cool story.pango
- You're not forced to watch them you know that right? It is the temptation you don't like?pango
- There are lots of men who are addicted to watching it or have issues with sex in relationships because of it. Look up death grip.Jaline
- That being said, it shouldn't be banned. There needs to be more education on it as well as information about how to treat a partner with respect.Jaline
- there are numerous women who justify their existence through childbirth or their husband's money. do we take measures to help this mental problem as well?imbecile
- But the bill is about sex trafficking right?pango
- What are you on about, imbecile? Those are different issues and they're all measured and evaluated in different ways.Jaline
- blanket statements of mens' actions deserve blanket statements of women's. so is porn for women empowering or shameful in today's climate?imbecile
- very important to know before continuing the conversation. she's empowered for performing but he's shamed for watching? hypocritical much?imbecile
- sexism entitlement continues to break new heights!imbecile
- If my memory is right, Elaine lost the bet...SimonFFM
- ^ haha, simonGnash