QBNX
QBNX
Out of context: Reply #35
- Started
- Last post
- 51 Responses
- scarabin7
i guess my main question is why
- ? http://www.qbn.com/r…PeterPancake
- ORAZAL???monospaced
- for a better tomorrowPeterPancake
- Ye age old riddle.notype
- it's an honest attempt at reducing the more misogynistic content at QBN, no wonder there's so much disgustPeterPancake
- No it isn’t it’s you being sensitive over something that doesn’t affect you. Calling people misogynistic for appreciating tits is stupid as fuckmonospaced
- Fucking PC Peter the snowflake. Fuck off with your dumbass threads.monospaced
- sorry, harshmonospaced
- what makes cotd misogynistic? at its heart it's practically worship of the femalescarabin
- cheers, m. PC is wank, I'm trying to avoid it.PeterPancake
- cotd is not in itself misogynistic and appreciating tits obv is not. Truly believe QBN is a place for such content.PeterPancake
- But the way it's presented can be off-putting to many (again, read the op for opinions). QBNX is just an experiment to a solution. Inclusive of PC and non-PC.PeterPancake
- (whatever that is).PeterPancake
- Boobs/Butt OTD fly much closer to the wire. Wouldn't you say they are somewhat demeaning?PeterPancake
- You’re trying to solve a problem that doesn’t exist in a way that makes no sense. Fucking orazal.monospaced
- we could always have all two of the ladies of qbn put it to a vote. we know sea_sea's down with cotd...scarabin
- lol, yup. I don't think we need our handheld. I can choose what threads to participate in and which to avoid with no problem thx.sea_sea
- This place isn't for the overly sensitive or those without a backbone. That's what makes it interesting imo.sea_sea
- Right, and you could just as easily classify those reacting to this change as overly sensitive and lacking a backbone.PeterPancake
- sea_sea, thats what i love about youdrgs
- No Peter, you're the one trying to make changes claiming some sort of uninclusion offense. Because changing the world to fit YOU is the new norm. Nope.sea_sea
- You seem so concerned about all those "new" people trying to get in on the conversation but will leave because they can't hang. Scar said it best, WHY.sea_sea
- I understand your point, I've read through it a few times, but that's not how the world works for everyone. Not trying to attack you for it either btw.sea_sea
- I understand some do step back because of questionable content, but it's usually the negative interaction with some of the participants that keeps them gone.sea_sea
- Also, you'd be amazed at the amount of people that claim to be gone, yet still lurk.
QBN would simply be dead without the participants that are already here.sea_sea - I contribute things to cotd that humanize and respect women. Sometimes they even get upvoted. We should make cotd better instead of making more smut threads.sarahfailin
- @sea_sea This isn't a personal project, I'm just the chump who set it up, interested in how the community would respond.PeterPancake
- let's not forget we have a photographer member here whose job is literally making cotd-type content. he may even be here for that threadscarabin
- @sarahfailin Same. Have about as much success pissing in the wind.PeterPancake
- @sea_sea Since you read the OP, what do you think of shellie's response, imagining she represents some of those "new" users we're referring to?PeterPancake
- @scar Don't see how QBNX wouldn't cater for that content? Do you think we need to make allowances for the Butt/Boobs OTD thread, too?PeterPancake
- Shellie's been here forever peter.sea_sea
- I know :). I was referring to shellie’s opinion of whether she would join QBN now, had she come across it as a new user.PeterPancake
- she did come across it as a new user, no doubtmonospaced