blog
blog
Out of context: Reply #67389
- Started
- Last post
- 75,571 Responses
- detritus0
Was just looking at a client's site, as I did a small job for them and they had exposure at a recent media event, so was curious to see if there was any mention.
Anyway.
It weighs 52Mb.
Fifty. Two. Megas.
I've dropped her a line to suggest we have a chat on the phone so I can offer advice on how to reduce things a little. I hope she doesn't take it as my mansplaining or pitching for work (I specifically said I wasn't pitching, and I don't really do web for other people any more.. although with stuff like this, I wonder whether perhaps I should).
52.
- homepage? 52mb is nothing across a large site, times have changed.fadein11
- not being rude but if a site with lovely retina imagery that's pretty normalfadein11
- "I hope she doesn't take it as my mansplaining" lolpinkfloyd
- Homepage. Sorry, 52Mb is ridiculous for a single page. And, if that IS normal for retina displays (it shouldn't be) then there should be media-queries for my PCdetritus
- yeah google hates that shit, whats the point of a beautiful site if no one sees it.moldero
- yep homepage of course it is, how lol?fadein11
- read my original post "52mb is nothing across a large site", I asked if homepage. post a link and let's have a lookfadein11
- its a CMS where the client uploads print ready 300dpi images usually.fadein11
- i'm still on dial uppinkfloyd
- Lol @ mansplaining fearcannonball1978
- lol @ this filesize/retina/dpi discussionmekk