Pic of the Day

Out of context: Reply #110195

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 129,651 Responses
  • BusterBoy3

    • she is actually on the right.zaq
    • thanks for clearing that up zaqTurboslacker
    • AnonymousBennn
    • i can see part of the shape of her breast,
      MUST...
      NOT...
      FAP...
      GuyFawkes
    • RESIST GUYFAWKES. FOR GODS SAKE...RESISTGucci
    • there are at least two humans under that burkasted
    • She is actually not in the photo at all.pango
    • niqab is the only stuff i can't accept. if you need to cover your body that's fine. but the fact that you have to cover your entire face makes this dress unisexsted
    • i mean those are guys with tnt on their chests right? it's just the caption what tells you something else...sted
    • Are these the 2 finalists in Saudi Arabia's Next Top Model?Akagiyama
    • meh...I hate these. Not sure banning works, but I hate the fact some think there is a need to cover the face in public. Backwards IMHO.BusterBoy
    • It's desert nomad religion. You go away for 6 months herding cattle, you don't want other men to look at your woman.shapesalad
    • In modern era it's more about male self-esteem, his girl is his, you aint having a look and for her showing devotion and dedication.shapesalad
    • Also it's saying "I have this religion/identity and I want to be entirely different from the rest of uk". Totally selfish and not considerate or assimilating.shapesalad
    • but it's so feministGnash
    • https://img.buzzfeed…set
    • religion... one helluva drugfadein11
    • Dementors!Maaku
    • so god created us in an image and then told only women to cover up ... not getting into a god debate but god or not, why are they not questioning this aspect.mugwart
    • they are, this isn't the norm anymore.
      and same could be said about any ludicrous religion.
      fadein11
    • I live in a city with a huge muslim population. I rarely see this. don't believe the hype.fadein11
    • Religions are regressing. Take a look at pics of Iran and Egypt in the 50s and 60s.BusterBoy
    • I see it in Seattle, but I really don't mind/notice.garbage
    • lol @ buster, clearly zero knowledge of Iran, it was a secular nation in the 50's and 60's run by a corrupt western capitalist puppet, hence the Iranianfadein11
    • revolution.fadein11
    • ya right, iran was then liberated by a religious fuckbucket who swirled the country back to the dark ages.Gnash
    • and here's egypt laughing at the idea of forced hijabs
      https://www.youtube.…
      Gnash
    • so much better now, of course, that women get to choose their shacklesGnash
    • I didn't say it was better lol. just pointing out Buster's total lack of knowledge when it comes to Iran's history. And gnash c'mon you claim to be brainyfadein11
    • you must know the big part the West played in iran's regression to radical religious nonsense.fadein11
    • A little like how ISIS grew out of the shitstorm left by the yanks 'freedom' mission post 9/11... lol. you know all this shit fella.fadein11
    • Desperate people make desperate choices. Always.fadein11
    • regardless of US involvement -- life was clearly better for all but the wing nuts before the zealots took over.Gnash
    • the pictures that Buster refer to only point to that fact -- he wasn't making any other inferenceGnash
    • doy ou know anyone apart from the idiot religious male fanatics who agree with that shit? I don't. I was referring to his statement about Iran. It wasn't a bedfadein11
    • of roses before the revolution and you know it, hence the revolution. I dislike religion of all flavours but these silly jokes about oppressed women getfadein11
    • a little tiresome. But they are a v.easy target of course so kind of get it. Weird targetting the oppressed for humour though isnt it.fadein11
    • [insert SJW comment here]fadein11
    • the only thing even remotely amusing is the brain-locked (western) retards who think wearing a large black sack is somehow anything other than oppression.Gnash
    • aside from that I can't think of a single woman who'd chose fucktard iran to live in, even without rose-beds. derpGnash
    • You don't have to cover face in Iran.maybe everycity is differentpango
    • (true, you don't have to wear the sacks there)Gnash
    • nothing derp about the facts I shared old chapfadein11
    • I pretty much said exactly what you said regarding the dress as well, like I said noone approves of this nonsense aside from the religious fanatic morons whofadein11
    • enforce it. But let's have a good laugh at the victims of it eh ;)fadein11
    • fade...no need to be a patronising smart arse mate. I know full well the history of Iran. I have relatives that lived there in the 50s so please don't lecture.BusterBoy
    • I was pointing out the change in the country and how the nation IN MY OPINION has regressed.BusterBoy
    • everyone else knew what you meant, buster. fades' a bit denseGnash
    • Yupset

View thread