Guardian redesign
Guardian redesign
Out of context: Reply #10
- Started
- Last post
- 14 Responses
- dbloc0
The ad on top is waaaaay too big. Look ridiculous. Also they should keep the navigation onscreen. Having to scroll all the way back to the top just to move around is stupid and bad UX.
- disagree, no user interacts with nav while scrolling down. Scrolling down implies content ingestion and most users in media seldom click the nav...whatthefunk
- disagree. I may scroll down to partially read article and then move on.dbloc
- what about when they are done with that article. To keep them on the site, it's best to have somewhere for them to go.dbloc
- I work in media, less than 1% of traffic click nav. 85% of users bounce after reading 2% of article.whatthefunk
- Hmm ok. honestly just speaking from my experience on the site.dbloc
- I like having the option to move around if I want to.dbloc
- I hear ya, was just giving a reason for what you called bad ux. Left rail, right rail, and bottom of article modules are to recirculate userswhatthefunk
- got it. My experience was bad UX. Not necessarily the experience of others.dbloc
- ad was there before as well. not a great deal has changed in the layoutfadein11