Circumcision

Out of context: Reply #169

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 226 Responses
  • sarahfailin4

    there is just no need for it! your junk doesn't need any improvement.

    the foreskin is supposed to be the most sensitive part of the penis. guess i'll never know!

    i definitely would not circumcise my kids or anyone else's

    • but, cunts with beards and silly hats know betterfuturefood
    • Bearded sky wizard worshippers with really weird sexual hang-ups always know best.PhanLo
    • It has nothing to do with religion, most of the time, and if one does it, that doesn't make them a "cunt with a beard"monospaced
    • eh, whatevermonospaced
    • Can't imaging God actually approving of this ... Rabbi passes over and he's there like "you did what to a small infant..."mugwart
    • 100% god is up there masturbating to all this madness.PhanLo
    • mono, but that's where it began. Now people do it to conform and be "normal", even though they are the minority in the world. It's a sad and 'tradition'.formed
    • they do it for health reasons, too, and it is the majority in the USA stillmonospaced
    • "health" reasons? Huh? That's nonsense too. Post-rationalizing something people do to conform to a perceived 'normal'.formed
    • 58% in the US and, thankfully, on the decline. 25-30% world wide. 2% in Spain and Sweden, 1% in Japan.formed
    • It's still the majority just like we have bible thumpers, etc., etc.formed
    • So god who is the personification of perfection and created everything, fucked up on our penises requiring us to correct his mistake? How do religitards explain_niko
    • This paradox?_niko
    • a majority. that's the best metricGnash
    • the majority may fool themselves into thinking they're doing it for health.Gnash
    • but "many mothers prefer circumcised penises and also want their sons to resemble their fathers"
      it's cultural and/or religious
      Gnash
    • The US appears to be Disneyland for adults.rabattski
    • It's not cultural or religious for us. It's for health reasons. Just like millions of other people. Stop telling me my reasons aren't real.monospaced
    • not saying they'r not real, they're just incorrect and misinformed.Gnash
    • cut off healthy tissue that might one day fall prey to disease. what other susceptible part of the body gets removed at birth?Gnash
    • The diseases in question are mostly rare in the developed world and are typically avoided by make simple behaviour choices.Gnash
    • and they are otherwise treatable without surgery.Gnash
    • thanks for your opinions, but my reasons certainly are not incorrect or misinformedmonospaced
    • do you have a son?monospaced
    • yup. that's why I know what I'm talking about. I researched the ass off this.Gnash
    • Even one of the docs who wrote 'the' paper for the AAP say he did his son for religious reasons, not medical.Gnash
    • "i had 3000 years of ancestors looking over my shoulder"Gnash
    • your conclusions are incorrect because you're basing them 'reasons' that are incorrectGnash
    • Thanks for your opinion.monospaced
    • an opinion based on the science, not the feelsGnash
    • also my opinion that we went to the moon, vaccines are beneficial, and water is made of hydrogen and oxygenGnash
    • I understand that it's a difficult barrier to overcome. a highly charged topic that's very emotional, so it's difficult to think rationally about.Gnash
    • it's charged because it's full of opinions, like yours, and like mine, and of those who are experts, and those who aren'tmonospaced
    • Climate-change deniers say the same thing. it's just an opinion. (but it's not)Gnash
    • the medical community is overwhelmingly against non-therapeutic circumcision, and that's based on science not opinions.Gnash
    • The AAP's position has been obliterated by nearly every relevant medical communityGnash
    • that's just a fact, not an opinionGnash
    • thanks for the opinion :)monospaced

View thread