Shooting of the Day

Out of context: Reply #1484

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 2,776 Responses
  • fadein114

    Can someone explain in a compact form why so many people will not let go of the right to bear arms... or at least have it tighter regulated?

    It's insane... I just do not get it.

    I know the right argues its liberals taking away freedom etc... but its gotta be deeper than that.

    What a strange nation that cares more about the right to carry a gun than having free healthcare for anyone who needs it.

    I am not stirring up anything here - just interested why a nation, after so many gun based tragedies refuses to accept it has a massive problem that no other country with tight gun laws suffers from.

    • Just blame the victim...it's the Murican way!utopian
    • Always wanted to know your nationality Utopian - I agree with pretty much everything you post, are you american but can seefadein11
    • its faults? or an ex pat living there? genuinely interested. no QBN pisstake here.fadein11
    • Americanutopian
    • It's a fetish, plain and simple. 'Mericans are infatuated with guns and will use anything to justify more of them.formed
    • Not all of them.monospaced
    • formed is infatuated with melodramagilgamush
    • the smell of freshly fired gunpowder is said to be addictive... also, taking away guns = castration to some guys...crazy it seemsvaxorcist
    • oooooor, it's a constitutional right, not a privilege, and the government will and can not infringe on my rights regardless of the details of the circumstancegilgamush
    • unless they feel like invoking the highly unconstitutional ramifications of the patriot act and then who ever they don't like are all getting royally shaftedgilgamush
    • And cordite has no chemically habit forming propertiesgilgamush
    • constitutional right... I hear this a lot. so you believe your government has no right to change laws that clearly are not working for the good of all? Bizarre.fadein11
    • No, the government works for the people, in of itself it cannot change anything. And there aren't enough people who feel the way you so to make any differencegilgamush
    • Gilga. Are you for more stric gun law or does that violates your constitutional right?pango
    • Strict gun laws won't solve anything in the US. It's different over here. That approach doesn't work, we have tried that and it failedgilgamush
    • That logic is more than a little fuzzy. The argument conveniently changes when you bring up the details..."it won't matter", "cars kill people", etc.formed
    • The real problem is the lack of acknowledgement and unwillingness to negotiate to make for a safer world.formed
    • Tried before? Like what?pango
    • where do rights come from?yurimon
    • seems like they dont teach critical thinking in art school or civics for that matter.yurimon
    • You said USA tried more stric gun laws before. Like what? When?pango
    • Are you lazy, do some research pango. should I goglle it for yougilgamush
    • how do you know how I feel?fadein11
    • Yes please google it for me.pango
    • C'mon gilga you know there has never been a truly restricting national gun laws that have been attempted. If so, we would have heard about them being lifted.monospaced
    • In fact, it would be a major topic.monospaced
    • There was an assault weapon ban that has expired and various states have more or less severe restrictions. It difrent state to stategilgamush

View thread