Shutterstock RF images?

Out of context: Reply #5

• Started
• Last post
• 7 Responses

• formed0

  I think iStock is too. It's only the crazy expensive sites that try to get you to submit for various licenses.

  How photographers (and companies) have managed to get those kinds of prices is beyond me. Last time I quoted one, I could have flown to Monaco, rented a helicopter and took my own pics for far less.

  formed 0Permalink

  UpvoteDownvote

  Flag

  • spending more than 10$ is expensive?Gnash
  • I know, I know. Some photog's charge thousands. the selfish bastards.Gnash
  • + time and postprocessing +++...instant access, that's what you pay foruan

  Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note

  SaveCancel

View thread