Shooting of the Day

Out of context: Reply #20

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 2,776 Responses
  • TheBlueOne2

    To the "We need our military grade assault guns to protect our freedoms" i.e. "keep your pinko commie nanny state hands off of my amerikkka" peeps:

    PLEASE POST LINKS TO ALL "MASS STABBING BY LONE WOLF ASSAILANT KILLS (10 OR MORE)" INCIDENTS IN ALL COUNTRIES THAT HAVE BANNED GUNS.

    I'll give you a ten year, heck twenty year window.

    Go ahead, I'll wait.

    • thank youmonospaced
    • http://en.wikipedia.…DrBombay
    • This shit does happen without guns. It is rare though.DrBombay
    • What constitutes a military grade assault weapon according to yougilgamush
    • yea, nobody wants to answer me that, i'm not surprised. cool ambiguous phrases that mean nothing and are meant only to invoke an emotional responsegilgamush
    • it's mental midgetry and has no merit,. there are many good points to be made for civilian disarmament and yet you stoop to buzz word reciting and name callinggilgamush
    • who are you talking to, gargamel?monospaced
    • Who do you think genius, the blue one. Why would you like to retortgilgamush
    • + a couple commasgilgamush
    • Yeah. Retort is that he left QBN years ago so you're basically talking to nobody. You'd know that if you had been here. , , , ,monospaced
    • mmm yea, didn't look at the date on the post. well anyways, you cosigned. would you care to define what constitutes a military grade assault weapongilgamush
    • a weapon designed to kill as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time with minimal effort, usually at close range, I'd saymonospaced
    • fully automatic, etc, the kind of thing you might need in war, but would NEVER need for self defense, or huntingmonospaced

View thread